Image not recorded
Minneapolis-MolineModel A
Minneapolis-Moline G1050
Row Crop
- power
- Not recorded
- displacement
- 504 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 10
Head to head · Row Crop
Minneapolis-Moline G1050 vs New Holland 8560
Image not recorded
New HollandModel B
New Holland 8560
Row Crop
- power
- Not recorded
- displacement
- 456 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 18
Minneapolis-MolineMinneapolis-Moline G1050
vs
New HollandNew Holland 8560
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Row Crop
Engine Displacement
▲ G1050 higher · +48 ci (+11%)G1050504 ci
8560456 ci
Median Row Crop Tractor391 ci
G1050 is in the 85th percentile; 8560 is in the 80th · 1,409 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedG10506
85606
Median Row Crop Tractor6
G1050 is in the 50th percentile; 8560 is in the 50th · 1,417 models
Forward Gears
▲ 8560 higher · +8 (+80%)G105010
856018
Median Row Crop Tractor16
G1050 is in the 22nd percentile; 8560 is in the 61st · 1,200 models
Operating Weight
▲ 8560 higher · +1,686 lb (+16%)G105010,700 lb
856012,386 lb
Median Row Crop Tractor12,307 lb
G1050 is in the 37th percentile; 8560 is in the 50th · 1,350 models
G1050 (A)8560 (B)Median Row Crop Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Minneapolis-Moline G1050 | New Holland 8560 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Minneapolis-Moline | New Holland | — |
| Model | G1050 | 8560 | — |
| Category | Row Crop | Row Crop | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Minneapolis-Moline G1050 | New Holland 8560 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Minneapolis-Moline | New Holland | — |
| Model | 8.3L 6-cyl diesel | Genesis | — |
| Rated RPM | 1,800RPM | 2,300RPM | ▲ 8560+500 RPM · +28% |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 | Same |
| Displacement | 504ci | 456ci | ▲ G1050+48 ci · +11% |
| Bore | 4.6in | 4.4in | ▲ G1050+0.2 in · +5% |
| Stroke | 5in | 5in | Same |
Transmission
| Spec | Minneapolis-Moline G1050 | New Holland 8560 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Two-speed power shift | selective gear fixed ratio with partial (6) range operator-controlled powershift | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Minneapolis-Moline G1050 | New Holland 8560 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 171in | 180in | ▲ 8560+9 in · +5% |
| Width | 94.3in | 84in | ▲ G1050+10.3 in · +12% |
| Height | 78in | Not recorded | — |
| Operating Weight | 10,700lb | 12,386lb | ▲ 8560+1,686 lb · +16% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Minneapolis-Moline G1050 | New Holland 8560 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Not recorded | closed center load sensing | — |
| Steering Type | Power | hydrostatic power | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Minneapolis-Moline G1050 | New Holland 8560 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Three-Point Hitch | 3-point | — |
| Hitch Category | Category 3 | II | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Minneapolis-Moline G1050 | New Holland 8560 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | 4x2 2WD | Same |
| Drive Type | 2WD | 2WD | Same |
| Steering Type | Power | hydrostatic power | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Minneapolis-Moline G1050 | New Holland 8560 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | electric | Same |
Capacities
| Spec | Minneapolis-Moline G1050 | New Holland 8560 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 8.3gal | 6.9gal | ▲ G1050+1.4 gal · +20% |
Operator Station
| Spec | Minneapolis-Moline G1050 | New Holland 8560 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | Cab | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Displacement
median 391 ciA · 85th percentile (504 ci)B · 80th percentile (456 ci)
Cylinders
median 6A · 50th percentile (6)B · 50th percentile (6)
Forward Gears
median 16A · 22nd percentile (10)B · 61st percentile (18)
Operating Weight
median 12,307 lbA · 37th percentile (10,700 lb)B · 50th percentile (12,386 lb)
Length
median 180 inA · 38th percentile (171 in)B · 50th percentile (180 in)
A · G1050B · 8560Median Row Crop Tractor