Image not recorded
HesstonModel A
Hesston 1580
Row Crop
- power
- Not recorded
- displacement
- 494 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 24
Head to head · Row Crop
Hesston 1580 vs Minneapolis-Moline G1050
Image not recorded
Minneapolis-MolineModel B
Minneapolis-Moline G1050
Row Crop
- power
- Not recorded
- displacement
- 504 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 10
HesstonHesston 1580
vs
Minneapolis-MolineMinneapolis-Moline G1050
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Row Crop
Engine Displacement
▲ G1050 higher · +10 ci (+2%)1580494 ci
G1050504 ci
Median Row Crop Tractor391 ci
1580 is in the 84th percentile; G1050 is in the 85th · 1,409 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tied15806
G10506
Median Row Crop Tractor6
1580 is in the 50th percentile; G1050 is in the 50th · 1,417 models
Forward Gears
▲ 1580 higher · +14 (+140%)158024
G105010
Median Row Crop Tractor16
1580 is in the 81st percentile; G1050 is in the 22nd · 1,200 models
Operating Weight
▲ 1580 higher · +2,650 lb (+25%)158013,350 lb
G105010,700 lb
Median Row Crop Tractor12,307 lb
1580 is in the 58th percentile; G1050 is in the 37th · 1,350 models
1580 (A)G1050 (B)Median Row Crop Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Hesston 1580 | Minneapolis-Moline G1050 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Hesston | Minneapolis-Moline | — |
| Model | 1580 | G1050 | — |
| Category | Row Crop | Row Crop | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Hesston 1580 | Minneapolis-Moline G1050 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Fiat | Minneapolis-Moline | — |
| Model | 8365-05 | 8.3L 6-cyl diesel | — |
| Rated RPM | 2,200RPM | 1,800RPM | ▲ 1580+400 RPM · +22% |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 | Same |
| Displacement | 494ci | 504ci | ▲ G1050+10 ci · +2% |
| Bore | 4.5in | 4.6in | ▲ G1050+0.1 in · +2% |
| Stroke | 5.1in | 5in | ▲ 1580+0.1 in · +2% |
Transmission
| Spec | Hesston 1580 | Minneapolis-Moline G1050 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | Two-speed power shift | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Hesston 1580 | Minneapolis-Moline G1050 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 170in | 171in | ▲ G1050+1 in · <1% |
| Width | Not recorded | 94.3in | — |
| Height | 72.3in | 78in | ▲ G1050+5.7 in · +8% |
| Operating Weight | 13,350lb | 10,700lb | ▲ 1580+2,650 lb · +25% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Hesston 1580 | Minneapolis-Moline G1050 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open center | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Power | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Hesston 1580 | Minneapolis-Moline G1050 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Not recorded | Three-Point Hitch | — |
| Hitch Category | II | Category 3 | — |
| Hitch Position | Not recorded | Rear | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Hesston 1580 | Minneapolis-Moline G1050 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | 4x2 2WD | Same |
| Drive Type | 2WD | 2WD | Same |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Power | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Hesston 1580 | Minneapolis-Moline G1050 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Capacities
| Spec | Hesston 1580 | Minneapolis-Moline G1050 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | Not recorded | 8.3gal | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | Hesston 1580 | Minneapolis-Moline G1050 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Cab | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Displacement
median 391 ciA · 84th percentile (494 ci)B · 85th percentile (504 ci)
Cylinders
median 6A · 50th percentile (6)B · 50th percentile (6)
Forward Gears
median 16A · 81st percentile (24)B · 22nd percentile (10)
Operating Weight
median 12,307 lbA · 58th percentile (13,350 lb)B · 37th percentile (10,700 lb)
Length
median 180 inA · 36th percentile (170 in)B · 38th percentile (171 in)
A · 1580B · G1050Median Row Crop Tractor