Head to head · Lawn and Garden

Cub Cadet 1320 vs Shibaura Ford 1100

Image not recorded
Cub CadetModel A

Cub Cadet 1320

Lawn and Garden

power
12.5 hp
displacement
24.3 ci
Cylinders
1
Forward gears
Not recorded
Full 1320 specs
Cub CadetCub Cadet 1320
vs
ShibauraShibaura Ford 1100

How they compare

Headline specs vs. the whole Lawn and Garden

n = 314–380

Engine Power

▲ Ford 1100 higher · +0.5 hp (+4%)
132012.5 hp
Ford 110013 hp
Median Lawn and Garden Tractor18 hp

1320 is in the 20th percentile; Ford 1100 is in the 22nd · 380 models

Engine Displacement

▲ Ford 1100 higher · +18.8 ci (+77%)
132024.3 ci
Ford 110043.1 ci
Median Lawn and Garden Tractor41.1 ci

1320 is in the 15th percentile; Ford 1100 is in the 56th · 366 models

Cylinders

▲ Ford 1100 higher · +1 (+100%)
13201
Ford 11002
Median Lawn and Garden Tractor2

1320 is in the 17th percentile; Ford 1100 is in the 50th · 376 models

Operating Weight

▲ Ford 1100 higher · +764 lb (+164%)
1320467 lb
Ford 11001,231 lb
Median Lawn and Garden Tractor738 lb

1320 is in the 11th percentile; Ford 1100 is in the 70th · 314 models

1320 (A)Ford 1100 (B)Median Lawn and Garden Tractor

Full comparison

Every spec, side by side

General Information

SpecCub Cadet 1320Shibaura Ford 1100Difference
ManufacturerCub CadetShibaura—
Model1320Ford 1100—
CategoryLawn and GardenUtility—

Engine

SpecCub Cadet 1320Shibaura Ford 1100Difference
ManufacturerKohlerShibaura—
ModelCV12.5LEK752C2—
Power Output12.5hp13hp▲ Ford 1100+0.5 hp · +4%
Rated RPMNot recorded2,600RPM—
Cylinders12▲ Ford 1100+1 · +100%
Displacement24.3ci43.1ci▲ Ford 1100+18.8 ci · +77%
Bore3.4in3in▲ 1320+0.4 in · +13%
Stroke2.6in3.2in▲ Ford 1100+0.5 in · +19%

Transmission

SpecCub Cadet 1320Shibaura Ford 1100Difference
TypeHydrostaticGear shift—

Dimensions & Weight

SpecCub Cadet 1320Shibaura Ford 1100Difference
Length68.1in94.9in▲ Ford 1100+26.8 in · +39%
WidthNot recorded42in—
HeightNot recorded79in—
Operating Weight467lb1,231lb▲ Ford 1100+764 lb · +164%

Hydraulics

SpecCub Cadet 1320Shibaura Ford 1100Difference
System TypeNot recordedOpen center—
Steering TypeManualManualSame

Power Take-off (PTO)

SpecCub Cadet 1320Shibaura Ford 1100Difference
TypeIndependent with mechanical clutchRear, transmission—
Speed 1Not recorded540rpm—

Tires

SpecCub Cadet 1320Shibaura Ford 1100Difference
Front Tire Size15x6Not recorded—
Rear Tire Size20x8Not recorded—

Hitch & Towing

SpecCub Cadet 1320Shibaura Ford 1100Difference
Hitch TypeNot recordedThree-Point Hitch Category I—
Hitch CategoryNot recordedI—
Hitch PositionNot recordedRear—
Hitch CapacityNot recorded881lb—

Chassis & Drive

SpecCub Cadet 1320Shibaura Ford 1100Difference
Chassis Type4x24x2 2WD—
Drive Type2WD2WDSame
Steering TypeManualManualSame
Brake TypeDry discDifferential mechanical drum—

Electrical

SpecCub Cadet 1320Shibaura Ford 1100Difference
Starter TypeElectricElectricSame

Capacities

SpecCub Cadet 1320Shibaura Ford 1100Difference
CoolantNot recorded0.8gal—

Operator Station

SpecCub Cadet 1320Shibaura Ford 1100Difference
TypeOpen operator stationROPS—

Category context

Both models against the field

Engine Power

median 18 hp
A · 20th percentile (12.5 hp)B · 22nd percentile (13 hp)

Engine Displacement

median 41.1 ci
A · 15th percentile (24.3 ci)B · 56th percentile (43.1 ci)

Cylinders

median 2
A · 17th percentile (1)B · 50th percentile (2)

Operating Weight

median 738 lb
A · 11th percentile (467 lb)B · 70th percentile (1,231 lb)

Length

median 71.7 in
A · 28th percentile (68.1 in)B · 85th percentile (94.9 in)
A · 1320B · Ford 1100Median Lawn and Garden Tractor
Full spec pageCub Cadet 1320Full spec pageShibaura Ford 1100