Image not recorded
Head to head · Utility
Ford 1200 vs Shibaura Ford 1100
ShibauraModel B
Shibaura Ford 1100
Utility
- power
- 13 hp
- displacement
- 43.1 ci
- Cylinders
- 2
- Forward gears
- 10
FordFord 1200
vs
ShibauraShibaura Ford 1100
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ 1200 higher · +3 hp (+23%)120016 hp
Ford 110013 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
1200 is in the 4th percentile; Ford 1100 is in the 1st · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 1200 higher · +6 ci (+14%)120049.1 ci
Ford 110043.1 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
1200 is in the 2nd percentile; Ford 1100 is in the 1st · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tied12002
Ford 11002
Median Utility Tractor4
1200 is in the 3rd percentile; Ford 1100 is in the 3rd · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
= Effectively tied120010
Ford 110010
Median Utility Tractor12
1200 is in the 39th percentile; Ford 1100 is in the 39th · 4,941 models
1200 (A)Ford 1100 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Ford 1200 | Shibaura Ford 1100 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Ford | Shibaura | — |
| Model | 1200 | Ford 1100 | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Ford 1200 | Shibaura Ford 1100 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Shibaura | Shibaura | Same |
| Model | LEK802D | LEK752C2 | — |
| Power Output | 16hp | 13hp | ▲ 1200+3 hp · +23% |
| Rated RPM | 2,700RPM | 2,600RPM | ▲ 1200+100 RPM · +4% |
| Cylinders | 2 | 2 | Same |
| Displacement | 49.1ci | 43.1ci | ▲ 1200+6 ci · +14% |
| Bore | 3.2in | 3in | ▲ 1200+0.1 in · +3% |
| Stroke | 3.2in | 3.2in | Same |
Transmission
| Spec | Ford 1200 | Shibaura Ford 1100 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Gear shift | Gear shift | Same |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Ford 1200 | Shibaura Ford 1100 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 94.9in | 94.9in | Same |
| Width | 42.2in | 42in | ▲ 1200+0.2 in · <1% |
| Height | 79in | 79in | Same |
| Operating Weight | 1,344lb | 1,231lb | ▲ 1200+113 lb · +9% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Ford 1200 | Shibaura Ford 1100 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Live | Open center | — |
| Steering Type | Manual | Manual | Same |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | Ford 1200 | Shibaura Ford 1100 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Rear, transmission | Rear, transmission | Same |
| Speed 1 | 540rpm | 540rpm | Same |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Ford 1200 | Shibaura Ford 1100 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Three-Point Hitch | Three-Point Hitch Category I | — |
| Hitch Category | I | I | Same |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Rear | Same |
| Hitch Capacity | 881lb | 881lb | Same |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Ford 1200 | Shibaura Ford 1100 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | 4x2 2WD | — |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 2WD | — |
| Steering Type | Manual | Manual | Same |
| Brake Type | Differential mechanical drum | Differential mechanical drum | Same |
Electrical
| Spec | Ford 1200 | Shibaura Ford 1100 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Capacities
| Spec | Ford 1200 | Shibaura Ford 1100 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 1.1gal | 0.8gal | ▲ 1200+0.3 gal · +38% |
Operator Station
| Spec | Ford 1200 | Shibaura Ford 1100 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | ROPS | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 4th percentile (16 hp)B · 1st percentile (13 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 2nd percentile (49.1 ci)B · 1st percentile (43.1 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 3rd percentile (2)B · 3rd percentile (2)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 39th percentile (10)B · 39th percentile (10)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 4th percentile (1,344 lb)B · 2nd percentile (1,231 lb)
A · 1200B · Ford 1100Median Utility Tractor