Cub CadetModel A
Cub Cadet 7265
Utility
- power
- 26 hp
- displacement
- 80.4 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
Head to head · Utility
Cub Cadet 7265 vs Ford 1000
Cub CadetCub Cadet 7265
vs
FordFord 1000
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ 7265 higher · +1 hp (+4%)726526 hp
100025 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
7265 is in the 18th percentile; 1000 is in the 16th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 7265 higher · +2.8 ci (+4%)726580.4 ci
100077.6 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
7265 is in the 13th percentile; 1000 is in the 11th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
▲ 7265 higher · +1 (+50%)72653
10002
Median Utility Tractor4
7265 is in the 23rd percentile; 1000 is in the 3rd · 5,720 models
Operating Weight
▲ 7265 higher · +70 lb (+3%)72652,370 lb
10002,300 lb
Median Utility Tractor5,303 lb
7265 is in the 15th percentile; 1000 is in the 14th · 5,107 models
7265 (A)1000 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Cub Cadet 7265 | Ford 1000 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Cub Cadet | Ford | — |
| Model | 7265 | 1000 | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Cub Cadet 7265 | Ford 1000 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Mitsubishi | Shibaura | — |
| Model | Not recorded | LE892 | — |
| Power Output | 26hp | 25hp | ▲ 7265+1 hp · +4% |
| Rated RPM | 2,600RPM | 2,500RPM | ▲ 7265+100 RPM · +4% |
| Cylinders | 3 | 2 | ▲ 7265+1 · +50% |
| Displacement | 80.4ci | 77.6ci | ▲ 7265+2.8 ci · +4% |
| Bore | 3.1in | 3.5in | ▲ 1000+0.4 in · +13% |
| Stroke | 3.6in | 3.9in | ▲ 1000+0.3 in · +8% |
Transmission
| Spec | Cub Cadet 7265 | Ford 1000 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Hydrostatic | Gear | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Cub Cadet 7265 | Ford 1000 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 115in | 101in | ▲ 7265+14 in · +14% |
| Width | 51.8in | Not recorded | — |
| Height | 83.5in | 54.3in | ▲ 7265+29.2 in · +54% |
| Operating Weight | 2,370lb | 2,300lb | ▲ 7265+70 lb · +3% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Cub Cadet 7265 | Ford 1000 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open Center | Open Center | Same |
| Steering Type | Power | Not recorded | — |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | Cub Cadet 7265 | Ford 1000 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Rear and Mid | Transmission | — |
| Speed 1 | 2,000rpm | 540rpm | ▲ 7265+1,460 rpm · +270% |
| Speed 2 | 540rpm | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Cub Cadet 7265 | Ford 1000 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Category I | Category I | Same |
| Hitch Category | Category 1 | I | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Cub Cadet 7265 | Ford 1000 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 MFWD | 4x2 2WD | — |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 2WD | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Cub Cadet 7265 | Ford 1000 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric Starter | — |
Capacities
| Spec | Cub Cadet 7265 | Ford 1000 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 1.7gal | 1.4gal | ▲ 7265+0.3 gal · +21% |
Operator Station
| Spec | Cub Cadet 7265 | Ford 1000 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | ROPS | Open, Optional two-post ROPS | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 18th percentile (26 hp)B · 16th percentile (25 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 13th percentile (80.4 ci)B · 11th percentile (77.6 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 23rd percentile (3)B · 3rd percentile (2)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 15th percentile (2,370 lb)B · 14th percentile (2,300 lb)
Length
median 137 inA · 20th percentile (115 in)B · 9th percentile (101 in)
A · 7265B · 1000Median Utility Tractor