Cub CadetModel A
Cub Cadet 7265
Utility
- power
- 26 hp
- displacement
- 80.4 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
Head to head · Utility
Cub Cadet 7265 vs Mitsubishi MT260
Image not recorded
MitsubishiModel B
Mitsubishi MT260
Utility
- power
- 26 hp
- displacement
- 80.4 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- 9
Cub CadetCub Cadet 7265
vs
MitsubishiMitsubishi MT260
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
= Effectively tied726526 hp
MT26026 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
7265 is in the 18th percentile; MT260 is in the 18th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
= Effectively tied726580.4 ci
MT26080.4 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
7265 is in the 13th percentile; MT260 is in the 12th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tied72653
MT2603
Median Utility Tractor4
7265 is in the 23rd percentile; MT260 is in the 23rd · 5,720 models
Operating Weight
▲ MT260 higher · +88 lb (+4%)72652,370 lb
MT2602,458 lb
Median Utility Tractor5,303 lb
7265 is in the 15th percentile; MT260 is in the 16th · 5,107 models
7265 (A)MT260 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Cub Cadet 7265 | Mitsubishi MT260 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Cub Cadet | Mitsubishi | — |
| Model | 7265 | MT260 | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Cub Cadet 7265 | Mitsubishi MT260 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Mitsubishi | Mitsubishi | Same |
| Power Output | 26hp | 26hp | Same |
| Rated RPM | 2,600RPM | 2,600RPM | Same |
| Cylinders | 3 | 3 | Same |
| Displacement | 80.4ci | 80.4ci | Same |
| Bore | 3.1in | Not recorded | — |
| Stroke | 3.6in | Not recorded | — |
Transmission
| Spec | Cub Cadet 7265 | Mitsubishi MT260 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Hydrostatic | Gear | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Cub Cadet 7265 | Mitsubishi MT260 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 115in | 115in | Same |
| Width | 51.8in | 52in | ▲ MT260+0.2 in · <1% |
| Height | 83.5in | 87in | ▲ MT260+3.5 in · +4% |
| Operating Weight | 2,370lb | 2,458lb | ▲ MT260+88 lb · +4% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Cub Cadet 7265 | Mitsubishi MT260 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open Center | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Hydrostatic power | — |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | Cub Cadet 7265 | Mitsubishi MT260 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Rear and Mid | Not recorded | — |
| Speed 1 | 2,000rpm | Not recorded | — |
| Speed 2 | 540rpm | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Cub Cadet 7265 | Mitsubishi MT260 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Category I | Three-Point Hitch | — |
| Hitch Category | Category 1 | I | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Cub Cadet 7265 | Mitsubishi MT260 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 MFWD | 4x2 2WD | — |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 2WD | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Hydrostatic power | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Cub Cadet 7265 | Mitsubishi MT260 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Capacities
| Spec | Cub Cadet 7265 | Mitsubishi MT260 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 1.7gal | Not recorded | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | Cub Cadet 7265 | Mitsubishi MT260 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | ROPS | ROPS | Same |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 18th percentile (26 hp)B · 18th percentile (26 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 13th percentile (80.4 ci)B · 12th percentile (80.4 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 23rd percentile (3)B · 23rd percentile (3)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 15th percentile (2,370 lb)B · 16th percentile (2,458 lb)
Length
median 137 inA · 20th percentile (115 in)B · 20th percentile (115 in)
A · 7265B · MT260Median Utility Tractor