Image not recorded
Head to head · Utility
Fendt 209 vs Fendt Favorit 509C
FendtModel B
Fendt Favorit 509C
Utility
- power
- 95 hp
- displacement
- 254 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
FendtFendt 209
vs
FendtFendt Favorit 509C
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ Favorit 509C higher · +2.5 hp (+3%)20992.5 hp
Favorit 509C95 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
209 is in the 79th percentile; Favorit 509C is in the 81st · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 209 higher · +9 ci (+4%)209263 ci
Favorit 509C254 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
209 is in the 74th percentile; Favorit 509C is in the 71st · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tied2094
Favorit 509C4
Median Utility Tractor4
209 is in the 50th percentile; Favorit 509C is in the 50th · 5,720 models
Operating Weight
▲ Favorit 509C higher · +4,123 lb (+60%)2096,834 lb
Favorit 509C10,957 lb
Median Utility Tractor5,303 lb
209 is in the 65th percentile; Favorit 509C is in the 88th · 5,107 models
209 (A)Favorit 509C (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Fendt 209 | Fendt Favorit 509C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Fendt | Fendt | Same |
| Model | 209 | Favorit 509C | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Fendt 209 | Fendt Favorit 509C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Deutz | MWM | — |
| Power Output | 92.5hp | 95hp | ▲ Favorit 509C+2.5 hp · +3% |
| Rated RPM | 2,300RPM | 2,300RPM | Same |
| Cylinders | 4 | 4 | Same |
| Displacement | 263ci | 254ci | ▲ 209+9 ci · +4% |
| Bore | 4in | 4.1in | ▲ Favorit 509C+0.1 in · +2% |
| Stroke | 5.2in | 4.7in | ▲ 209+0.5 in · +11% |
Transmission
| Spec | Fendt 209 | Fendt Favorit 509C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Synchromesh | Four-speed power shift | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Fendt 209 | Fendt Favorit 509C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 146in | 165in | ▲ Favorit 509C+19 in · +13% |
| Width | 77.3in | 82.3in | ▲ Favorit 509C+5 in · +6% |
| Height | 98.4in | 110in | ▲ Favorit 509C+11.6 in · +12% |
| Operating Weight | 6,834lb | 10,957lb | ▲ Favorit 509C+4,123 lb · +60% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Fendt 209 | Fendt Favorit 509C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open Center | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Power | Same |
Tires
| Spec | Fendt 209 | Fendt Favorit 509C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Front Tire Size | 335/80R18 | Not recorded | — |
| Rear Tire Size | 480/70R30 | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Fendt 209 | Fendt Favorit 509C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Category 3 | Rear Type III/II | — |
| Hitch Category | 2 | Category 3 | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Rear | Same |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Fendt 209 | Fendt Favorit 509C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | Same |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD | Same |
| Steering Type | Power | Power | Same |
Electrical
| Spec | Fendt 209 | Fendt Favorit 509C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | 12 volt | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | Fendt 209 | Fendt Favorit 509C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | Cab | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 79th percentile (92.5 hp)B · 81st percentile (95 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 74th percentile (263 ci)B · 71st percentile (254 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 50th percentile (4)B · 50th percentile (4)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 65th percentile (6,834 lb)B · 88th percentile (10,957 lb)
Length
median 137 inA · 61st percentile (146 in)B · 82nd percentile (165 in)
A · 209B · Favorit 509CMedian Utility Tractor