Image not recorded
Head to head · Utility
Fendt 209 vs New Holland TL5050
Image not recorded
New HollandModel B
New Holland TL5050
Utility
- power
- 90 hp
- displacement
- 254 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 12
FendtFendt 209
vs
New HollandNew Holland TL5050
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ 209 higher · +2.5 hp (+3%)20992.5 hp
TL505090 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
209 is in the 79th percentile; TL5050 is in the 78th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 209 higher · +9 ci (+4%)209263 ci
TL5050254 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
209 is in the 74th percentile; TL5050 is in the 72nd · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tied2094
TL50504
Median Utility Tractor4
209 is in the 50th percentile; TL5050 is in the 50th · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
▲ 209 higher · +9 (+75%)20921
TL505012
Median Utility Tractor12
209 is in the 88th percentile; TL5050 is in the 50th · 4,941 models
209 (A)TL5050 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Fendt 209 | New Holland TL5050 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Fendt | New Holland | — |
| Model | 209 | TL5050 | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Fendt 209 | New Holland TL5050 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Deutz | Weifang-Deutz | — |
| Model | Not recorded | TD 226B-4 | — |
| Power Output | 92.5hp | 90hp | ▲ 209+2.5 hp · +3% |
| Rated RPM | 2,300RPM | 2,500RPM | ▲ TL5050+200 RPM · +9% |
| Cylinders | 4 | 4 | Same |
| Displacement | 263ci | 254ci | ▲ 209+9 ci · +4% |
| Bore | 4in | 4.1in | ▲ TL5050+0.1 in · +2% |
| Stroke | 5.2in | 4.7in | ▲ 209+0.5 in · +11% |
Transmission
| Spec | Fendt 209 | New Holland TL5050 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Synchromesh | Shuttle Command | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Fendt 209 | New Holland TL5050 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 146in | 154in | ▲ TL5050+8 in · +5% |
| Width | 77.3in | Not recorded | — |
| Height | 98.4in | 100in | ▲ TL5050+1.6 in · +2% |
| Operating Weight | 6,834lb | 7,022lb | ▲ TL5050+188 lb · +3% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Fendt 209 | New Holland TL5050 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open Center | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Hydrostatic power | — |
Tires
| Spec | Fendt 209 | New Holland TL5050 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Front Tire Size | 335/80R18 | Not recorded | — |
| Rear Tire Size | 480/70R30 | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Fendt 209 | New Holland TL5050 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Category 3 | Category 2 | — |
| Hitch Category | 2 | II | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Rear | Same |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Fendt 209 | New Holland TL5050 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | 4x2 2WD | — |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 2WD | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Hydrostatic power | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Fendt 209 | New Holland TL5050 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 79th percentile (92.5 hp)B · 78th percentile (90 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 74th percentile (263 ci)B · 72nd percentile (254 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 50th percentile (4)B · 50th percentile (4)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 88th percentile (21)B · 50th percentile (12)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 65th percentile (6,834 lb)B · 67th percentile (7,022 lb)
A · 209B · TL5050Median Utility Tractor