Image not recorded
FordModel A
Ford 1620
Utility
- power
- 27.4 hp
- displacement
- 81.2 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
Head to head · Utility
Ford 1620 vs John Deere 870
John DeereModel B
John Deere 870
Utility
- power
- 28 hp
- displacement
- 83.1 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- 9
FordFord 1620
vs
John DeereJohn Deere 870
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ 870 higher · +0.6 hp (+2%)162027.4 hp
87028 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
1620 is in the 19th percentile; 870 is in the 20th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 870 higher · +1.9 ci (+2%)162081.2 ci
87083.1 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
1620 is in the 13th percentile; 870 is in the 14th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tied16203
8703
Median Utility Tractor4
1620 is in the 23rd percentile; 870 is in the 23rd · 5,720 models
Operating Weight
▲ 870 higher · +282 lb (+13%)16202,233 lb
8702,515 lb
Median Utility Tractor5,303 lb
1620 is in the 14th percentile; 870 is in the 17th · 5,107 models
1620 (A)870 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Ford 1620 | John Deere 870 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Ford | John Deere | — |
| Model | 1620 | 870 | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Ford 1620 | John Deere 870 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Shibaura | Yanmar | — |
| Model | Not recorded | 3TN84 | — |
| Power Output | 27.4hp | 28hp | ▲ 870+0.6 hp · +2% |
| Rated RPM | 2,600RPM | 2,600RPM | Same |
| Cylinders | 3 | 3 | Same |
| Displacement | 81.2ci | 83.1ci | ▲ 870+1.9 ci · +2% |
| Bore | 3.3in | 3.3in | Same |
| Stroke | 3.2in | 3.4in | ▲ 870+0.3 in · +10% |
Transmission
| Spec | Ford 1620 | John Deere 870 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Hydrostatic | Collar Shift | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Ford 1620 | John Deere 870 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 112in | 123in | ▲ 870+11 in · +10% |
| Width | 48.4in | 70.5in | ▲ 870+22.1 in · +46% |
| Height | 84.3in | 82.7in | ▲ 1620+1.6 in · +2% |
| Operating Weight | 2,233lb | 2,515lb | ▲ 870+282 lb · +13% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Ford 1620 | John Deere 870 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open center | Open Center | Same |
| Steering Type | Power | Manual | — |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | Ford 1620 | John Deere 870 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Live | Live with two stage clutch | — |
| Speed 1 | 540rpm | 540rpm | Same |
| Speed 2 | 2,000rpm | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Ford 1620 | John Deere 870 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Three-Point Hitch | Three-Point Hitch | Same |
| Hitch Category | I | I | Same |
| Hitch Position | Not recorded | Rear | — |
| Hitch Capacity | 1,930lb | 1,879lb | ▲ 1620+51 lb · +3% |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Ford 1620 | John Deere 870 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | 4x2 2WD | Same |
| Drive Type | 2WD | 2WD | Same |
| Steering Type | Power | Manual | — |
| Brake Type | Wet disc | Differential Wet Disc | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Ford 1620 | John Deere 870 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Capacities
| Spec | Ford 1620 | John Deere 870 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | Not recorded | 1.4gal | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | Ford 1620 | John Deere 870 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Two-post ROPS | Open with two-post ROPS | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 19th percentile (27.4 hp)B · 20th percentile (28 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 13th percentile (81.2 ci)B · 14th percentile (83.1 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 23rd percentile (3)B · 23rd percentile (3)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 14th percentile (2,233 lb)B · 17th percentile (2,515 lb)
Length
median 137 inA · 18th percentile (112 in)B · 32nd percentile (123 in)
A · 1620B · 870Median Utility Tractor