Image not recorded
FordModel A
Ford 1620
Utility
- power
- 27.4 hp
- displacement
- 81.2 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
Head to head · Utility
Ford 1620 vs New Holland T1510
New HollandModel B
New Holland T1510
Utility
- power
- 30 hp
- displacement
- 91.3 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- 9
FordFord 1620
vs
New HollandNew Holland T1510
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ T1510 higher · +2.6 hp (+9%)162027.4 hp
T151030 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
1620 is in the 19th percentile; T1510 is in the 22nd · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ T1510 higher · +10.1 ci (+12%)162081.2 ci
T151091.3 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
1620 is in the 13th percentile; T1510 is in the 17th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tied16203
T15103
Median Utility Tractor4
1620 is in the 23rd percentile; T1510 is in the 23rd · 5,720 models
Operating Weight
▲ T1510 higher · +152 lb (+7%)16202,233 lb
T15102,385 lb
Median Utility Tractor5,303 lb
1620 is in the 14th percentile; T1510 is in the 15th · 5,107 models
1620 (A)T1510 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Ford 1620 | New Holland T1510 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Ford | New Holland | — |
| Model | 1620 | T1510 | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Ford 1620 | New Holland T1510 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Shibaura | Shibaura | Same |
| Model | Not recorded | N843 | — |
| Power Output | 27.4hp | 30hp | ▲ T1510+2.6 hp · +9% |
| Rated RPM | 2,600RPM | 2,600RPM | Same |
| Cylinders | 3 | 3 | Same |
| Displacement | 81.2ci | 91.3ci | ▲ T1510+10.1 ci · +12% |
| Bore | 3.3in | 3.3in | Same |
| Stroke | 3.2in | 3.5in | ▲ T1510+0.4 in · +13% |
Transmission
| Spec | Ford 1620 | New Holland T1510 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Hydrostatic | Gear type | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Ford 1620 | New Holland T1510 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 112in | 111in | ▲ 1620+1 in · <1% |
| Width | 48.4in | 62in | ▲ T1510+13.6 in · +28% |
| Height | 84.3in | 82.3in | ▲ 1620+2 in · +2% |
| Operating Weight | 2,233lb | 2,385lb | ▲ T1510+152 lb · +7% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Ford 1620 | New Holland T1510 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open center | Open center | Same |
| Steering Type | Power | Hydrostatic power | — |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | Ford 1620 | New Holland T1510 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Live | Live | Same |
| Speed 1 | 540rpm | 540rpm | Same |
| Speed 2 | 2,000rpm | 2,000rpm | Same |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Ford 1620 | New Holland T1510 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Three-Point Hitch | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Category | I | I | Same |
| Hitch Capacity | 1,930lb | 1,930lb | Same |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Ford 1620 | New Holland T1510 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | 4x2 2WD | Same |
| Drive Type | 2WD | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Hydrostatic power | — |
| Brake Type | Wet disc | Wet disc type | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Ford 1620 | New Holland T1510 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Operator Station
| Spec | Ford 1620 | New Holland T1510 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Two-post ROPS | Two-post foldable ROPS | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 19th percentile (27.4 hp)B · 22nd percentile (30 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 13th percentile (81.2 ci)B · 17th percentile (91.3 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 23rd percentile (3)B · 23rd percentile (3)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 14th percentile (2,233 lb)B · 15th percentile (2,385 lb)
Length
median 137 inA · 18th percentile (112 in)B · 17th percentile (111 in)
A · 1620B · T1510Median Utility Tractor