Head to head · Utility
Ford 1700 vs John Deere 1025R
John DeereModel B
John Deere 1025R
Utility
- power
- 23.9 hp
- displacement
- 77.3 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- 2
FordFord 1700
vs
John DeereJohn Deere 1025R
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
= Effectively tied170023.9 hp
1025R23.9 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
1700 is in the 13th percentile; 1025R is in the 13th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 1700 higher · +0.4 ci (<1%)170077.7 ci
1025R77.3 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
1700 is in the 11th percentile; 1025R is in the 11th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
▲ 1025R higher · +1 (+50%)17002
1025R3
Median Utility Tractor4
1700 is in the 3rd percentile; 1025R is in the 23rd · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
▲ 1700 higher · +10 (+500%)170012
1025R2
Median Utility Tractor12
1700 is in the 50th percentile; 1025R is in the 1st · 4,941 models
1700 (A)1025R (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Ford 1700 | John Deere 1025R | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Ford | John Deere | — |
| Model | 1700 | 1025R | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility, Sub-Compact | — |
Engine
| Spec | Ford 1700 | John Deere 1025R | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Shibaura | Yanmar | — |
| Model | LE892 | 3TNV80F-NCJT | — |
| Power Output | 23.9hp | 23.9hp | Same |
| Rated RPM | 2,500RPM | 3,200RPM | ▲ 1025R+700 RPM · +28% |
| Cylinders | 2 | 3 | ▲ 1025R+1 · +50% |
| Displacement | 77.7ci | 77.3ci | ▲ 1700+0.4 ci · <1% |
| Bore | 3.5in | 3.2in | ▲ 1700+0.4 in · +13% |
| Stroke | 3.9in | 3.3in | ▲ 1700+0.6 in · +18% |
Transmission
| Spec | Ford 1700 | John Deere 1025R | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Gear shift | Hydrostatic | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Ford 1700 | John Deere 1025R | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 111in | 87.6in | ▲ 1700+23.4 in · +27% |
| Width | 59.3in | 47.2in | ▲ 1700+12.1 in · +26% |
| Height | 85.5in | 86.2in | ▲ 1025R+0.7 in · <1% |
| Operating Weight | 2,444lb | 1,444lb | ▲ 1700+1,000 lb · +69% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Ford 1700 | John Deere 1025R | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open center | Open center | Same |
| Steering Type | Manual | Hydrostatic power | — |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | Ford 1700 | John Deere 1025R | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Rear, transmission | Independent | — |
| Speed 1 | 540rpm | 540rpm | Same |
| Speed 2 | Not recorded | 2,100rpm | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Ford 1700 | John Deere 1025R | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Three-point hitch | Three-Point Hitch | Same |
| Hitch Category | I | Category I Limited | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Rear | Same |
| Hitch Capacity | Not recorded | 1,177lb | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Ford 1700 | John Deere 1025R | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | Not recorded | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | — |
| Drive Type | 2WD | 4WD | — |
| Steering Type | Manual | Hydrostatic power | — |
| Brake Type | Mechanical drum | Wet disc | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Ford 1700 | John Deere 1025R | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric starter | Electric | — |
Capacities
| Spec | Ford 1700 | John Deere 1025R | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 1.4gal | 1gal | ▲ 1700+0.4 gal · +40% |
Operator Station
| Spec | Ford 1700 | John Deere 1025R | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Open with ROPS | Open Station with Foldable ROPS | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 13th percentile (23.9 hp)B · 13th percentile (23.9 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 11th percentile (77.7 ci)B · 11th percentile (77.3 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 3rd percentile (2)B · 23rd percentile (3)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 50th percentile (12)B · 1st percentile (2)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 16th percentile (2,444 lb)B · 5th percentile (1,444 lb)
A · 1700B · 1025RMedian Utility Tractor