Head to head · Utility
Ford 1900 vs Yanmar YM3110
Image not recorded
YanmarModel B
Yanmar YM3110
Utility
- power
- 30.6 hp
- displacement
- 91.3 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- 15
FordFord 1900
vs
YanmarYanmar YM3110
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ YM3110 higher · +0.6 hp (+2%)190030 hp
YM311030.6 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
1900 is in the 22nd percentile; YM3110 is in the 23rd · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ YM3110 higher · +4.1 ci (+5%)190087.2 ci
YM311091.3 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
1900 is in the 15th percentile; YM3110 is in the 17th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tied19003
YM31103
Median Utility Tractor4
1900 is in the 23rd percentile; YM3110 is in the 23rd · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
▲ YM3110 higher · +3 (+25%)190012
YM311015
Median Utility Tractor12
1900 is in the 50th percentile; YM3110 is in the 64th · 4,941 models
1900 (A)YM3110 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Ford 1900 | Yanmar YM3110 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Ford | Yanmar | — |
| Model | 1900 | YM3110 | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Ford 1900 | Yanmar YM3110 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Shibaura | Yanmar | — |
| Model | LEM853 | 3T84 | — |
| Power Output | 30hp | 30.6hp | ▲ YM3110+0.6 hp · +2% |
| Rated RPM | 2,800RPM | 2,600RPM | ▲ 1900+200 RPM · +8% |
| Cylinders | 3 | 3 | Same |
| Displacement | 87.2ci | 91.3ci | ▲ YM3110+4.1 ci · +5% |
| Bore | 3.4in | 3.3in | ▲ 1900+0.1 in · +3% |
| Stroke | 3.3in | 3.5in | ▲ YM3110+0.2 in · +6% |
Transmission
| Spec | Ford 1900 | Yanmar YM3110 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Gear shift | Partial Power Shift | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Ford 1900 | Yanmar YM3110 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 119in | 122in | ▲ YM3110+3 in · +3% |
| Width | 57.7in | 58in | ▲ YM3110+0.3 in · <1% |
| Height | 86.3in | 73in | ▲ 1900+13.3 in · +18% |
| Operating Weight | 2,689lb | 2,733lb | ▲ YM3110+44 lb · +2% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Ford 1900 | Yanmar YM3110 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open center | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Manual | Not recorded | — |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | Ford 1900 | Yanmar YM3110 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Rear, transmission | Not recorded | — |
| Speed 1 | 540rpm | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Ford 1900 | Yanmar YM3110 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Category | Not recorded | Category 3 | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Ford 1900 | Yanmar YM3110 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | Not recorded | 4x2 2WD | — |
| Drive Type | 2WD | 2WD | Same |
| Steering Type | Manual | Not recorded | — |
| Brake Type | Differential mechanical drum | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Ford 1900 | Yanmar YM3110 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric starter | Not recorded | — |
Capacities
| Spec | Ford 1900 | Yanmar YM3110 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 1.8gal | Not recorded | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | Ford 1900 | Yanmar YM3110 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | ROPS | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 22nd percentile (30 hp)B · 23rd percentile (30.6 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 15th percentile (87.2 ci)B · 17th percentile (91.3 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 23rd percentile (3)B · 23rd percentile (3)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 50th percentile (12)B · 64th percentile (15)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 19th percentile (2,689 lb)B · 19th percentile (2,733 lb)
A · 1900B · YM3110Median Utility Tractor