Image not recorded
Head to head · Row Crop
Ford 4000 vs Ford Commander 6000
Image not recorded
FordModel B
Ford Commander 6000
Row Crop
- power
- Not recorded
- displacement
- 242 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 10
FordFord 4000
vs
FordFord Commander 6000
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Row Crop
Engine Displacement
▲ Commander 6000 higher · +70 ci (+41%)4000172 ci
Commander 6000242 ci
Median Row Crop Tractor391 ci
4000 is in the 5th percentile; Commander 6000 is in the 14th · 1,409 models
Cylinders
▲ Commander 6000 higher · +2 (+50%)40004
Commander 60006
Median Row Crop Tractor6
4000 is in the 17th percentile; Commander 6000 is in the 50th · 1,417 models
Forward Gears
▲ Commander 6000 higher · +2 (+25%)40008
Commander 600010
Median Row Crop Tractor16
4000 is in the 16th percentile; Commander 6000 is in the 22nd · 1,200 models
Operating Weight
▲ Commander 6000 higher · +3,968 lb (+125%)40003,162 lb
Commander 60007,130 lb
Median Row Crop Tractor12,307 lb
4000 is in the 3rd percentile; Commander 6000 is in the 16th · 1,350 models
4000 (A)Commander 6000 (B)Median Row Crop Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Ford 4000 | Ford Commander 6000 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Ford | Ford | Same |
| Model | 4000 | Commander 6000 | — |
| Category | Utility, Row Crop | Row Crop | — |
Engine
| Spec | Ford 4000 | Ford Commander 6000 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Ford | Ford | Same |
| Model | Ford 2.8L 4-cyl gasoline | Not recorded | — |
| Power Output | 47.9hp | Not recorded | — |
| Rated RPM | 2,000RPM | 2,430RPM | ▲ Commander 6000+430 RPM · +22% |
| Cylinders | 4 | 6 | ▲ Commander 6000+2 · +50% |
| Displacement | 172ci | 242ci | ▲ Commander 6000+70 ci · +41% |
| Bore | 3.9in | 3.6in | ▲ 4000+0.3 in · +8% |
| Stroke | 3.6in | 3.9in | ▲ Commander 6000+0.3 in · +8% |
Transmission
| Spec | Ford 4000 | Ford Commander 6000 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Gear | Full power shift | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Ford 4000 | Ford Commander 6000 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 121in | 142in | ▲ Commander 6000+21 in · +17% |
| Width | Not recorded | 71.5in | — |
| Height | 57.3in | 78.2in | ▲ Commander 6000+20.9 in · +36% |
| Operating Weight | 3,162lb | 7,130lb | ▲ Commander 6000+3,968 lb · +125% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Ford 4000 | Ford Commander 6000 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open Center | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Manual | Power | — |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | Ford 4000 | Ford Commander 6000 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | Independent | — |
| Speed 1 | Not recorded | 540rpm | — |
| Speed 2 | Not recorded | 1,000rpm | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Ford 4000 | Ford Commander 6000 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Category | I | II/I | — |
| Hitch Position | Not recorded | Rear | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Ford 4000 | Ford Commander 6000 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 | 4x2 2WD | — |
| Drive Type | 2WD | 2WD | Same |
| Steering Type | Manual | Power | — |
| Brake Type | Not recorded | Differential hydraulic wet disc | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Ford 4000 | Ford Commander 6000 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Capacities
| Spec | Ford 4000 | Ford Commander 6000 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 3.5gal | 3.9gal | ▲ Commander 6000+0.4 gal · +11% |
Operator Station
| Spec | Ford 4000 | Ford Commander 6000 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Open | Open operator station | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Displacement
median 391 ciA · 5th percentile (172 ci)B · 14th percentile (242 ci)
Cylinders
median 6A · 17th percentile (4)B · 50th percentile (6)
Forward Gears
median 16A · 16th percentile (8)B · 22nd percentile (10)
Operating Weight
median 12,307 lbA · 3rd percentile (3,162 lb)B · 16th percentile (7,130 lb)
Length
median 180 inA · 3rd percentile (121 in)B · 13th percentile (142 in)
A · 4000B · Commander 6000Median Row Crop Tractor