
Head to head · Utility
Ford 7610 vs New Holland T1510


New HollandModel B
New Holland T1510
Utility
- power
- 30 hp
- displacement
- 91.3 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- 9
FordFord 7610
vs
New HollandNew Holland T1510
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ 7610 higher · +67 hp (+223%)761097 hp
T151030 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
7610 is in the 82nd percentile; T1510 is in the 22nd · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 7610 higher · +177 ci (+194%)7610268 ci
T151091.3 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
7610 is in the 75th percentile; T1510 is in the 17th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
▲ 7610 higher · +1 (+33%)76104
T15103
Median Utility Tractor4
7610 is in the 50th percentile; T1510 is in the 23rd · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
▲ 7610 higher · +7 (+78%)761016
T15109
Median Utility Tractor12
7610 is in the 73rd percentile; T1510 is in the 35th · 4,941 models
7610 (A)T1510 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Ford 7610 | New Holland T1510 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Ford | New Holland | — |
| Model | 7610 | T1510 | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Ford 7610 | New Holland T1510 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Ford | Shibaura | — |
| Model | Not recorded | N843 | — |
| Power Output | 97hp | 30hp | ▲ 7610+67 hp · +223% |
| Rated RPM | 2,100RPM | 2,600RPM | ▲ T1510+500 RPM · +24% |
| Cylinders | 4 | 3 | ▲ 7610+1 · +33% |
| Displacement | 268ci | 91.3ci | ▲ 7610+177 ci · +194% |
| Bore | 4.4in | 3.3in | ▲ 7610+1.1 in · +33% |
| Stroke | 4.4in | 3.5in | ▲ 7610+0.9 in · +26% |
Transmission
| Spec | Ford 7610 | New Holland T1510 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Synchromesh Partial Power Shift | Gear type | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Ford 7610 | New Holland T1510 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 145in | 111in | ▲ 7610+34 in · +31% |
| Width | 76.8in | 62in | ▲ 7610+14.8 in · +24% |
| Height | 95.7in | 82.3in | ▲ 7610+13.4 in · +16% |
| Operating Weight | 5,935lb | 2,385lb | ▲ 7610+3,550 lb · +149% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Ford 7610 | New Holland T1510 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open center | Open center | Same |
| Steering Type | Power | Hydrostatic power | — |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | Ford 7610 | New Holland T1510 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Independent | Live | — |
| Speed 1 | 540rpm | 540rpm | Same |
| Speed 2 | 1,000rpm | 2,000rpm | ▲ T1510+1,000 rpm · +100% |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Ford 7610 | New Holland T1510 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Three-Point Hitch | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Category | II | I | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Capacity | 4,480lb | 1,930lb | ▲ 7610+2,550 lb · +132% |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Ford 7610 | New Holland T1510 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | 4x2 2WD | Same |
| Drive Type | 2WD | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Hydrostatic power | — |
| Brake Type | Differential mechanical wet disc | Wet disc type | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Ford 7610 | New Holland T1510 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Capacities
| Spec | Ford 7610 | New Holland T1510 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 4.5gal | Not recorded | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | Ford 7610 | New Holland T1510 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Two-post ROPS | Two-post foldable ROPS | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 82nd percentile (97 hp)B · 22nd percentile (30 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 75th percentile (268 ci)B · 17th percentile (91.3 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 50th percentile (4)B · 23rd percentile (3)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 73rd percentile (16)B · 35th percentile (9)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 56th percentile (5,935 lb)B · 15th percentile (2,385 lb)
A · 7610B · T1510Median Utility Tractor