GibsonModel A
Gibson I
Standard Tread
- power
- Not recorded
- displacement
- 237 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 4
Head to head · Standard Tread
Gibson I vs Massey-Harris Challenger
Massey-HarrisModel B
Massey-Harris Challenger
Standard Tread
- power
- Not recorded
- displacement
- 248 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 4
GibsonGibson I
vs
Massey-HarrisMassey-Harris Challenger
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Standard Tread
Engine Displacement
▲ Challenger higher · +11 ci (+5%)I237 ci
Challenger248 ci
Median Standard Tread Tractor382 ci
I is in the 19th percentile; Challenger is in the 20th · 353 models
Cylinders
▲ I higher · +2 (+50%)I6
Challenger4
Median Standard Tread Tractor4
I is in the 93rd percentile; Challenger is in the 50th · 367 models
Forward Gears
= Effectively tiedI4
Challenger4
Median Standard Tread Tractor4
I is in the 50th percentile; Challenger is in the 50th · 341 models
Operating Weight
▲ I higher · +312 lb (+7%)I4,512 lb
Challenger4,200 lb
Median Standard Tread Tractor6,834 lb
I is in the 20th percentile; Challenger is in the 16th · 297 models
I (A)Challenger (B)Median Standard Tread Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Gibson I | Massey-Harris Challenger | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Gibson | Massey-Harris | — |
| Model | I | Challenger | — |
| Category | Standard Tread | Standard Tread | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Gibson I | Massey-Harris Challenger | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Hercules | Massey-Harris | — |
| Model | QXLD | Not recorded | — |
| Rated RPM | 1,800RPM | 1,200RPM | ▲ I+600 RPM · +50% |
| Cylinders | 6 | 4 | ▲ I+2 · +50% |
| Displacement | 237ci | 248ci | ▲ Challenger+11 ci · +5% |
| Bore | 3.4in | 3.9in | ▲ Challenger+0.5 in · +15% |
| Stroke | 4.1in | 5.3in | ▲ Challenger+1.2 in · +29% |
Transmission
| Spec | Gibson I | Massey-Harris Challenger | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Gear | Gear | Same |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Gibson I | Massey-Harris Challenger | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 127in | 129in | ▲ Challenger+2 in · +2% |
| Height | 67in | 58in | ▲ I+9 in · +16% |
| Operating Weight | 4,512lb | 4,200lb | ▲ I+312 lb · +7% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Gibson I | Massey-Harris Challenger | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Steering Type | Manual | Manual | Same |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Gibson I | Massey-Harris Challenger | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | Not recorded | — |
| Drive Type | 2WD | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Manual | Manual | Same |
Electrical
| Spec | Gibson I | Massey-Harris Challenger | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Not recorded | — |
Capacities
| Spec | Gibson I | Massey-Harris Challenger | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 4gal | 5gal | ▲ Challenger+1 gal · +25% |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Displacement
median 382 ciA · 19th percentile (237 ci)B · 20th percentile (248 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 93rd percentile (6)B · 50th percentile (4)
Forward Gears
median 4A · 50th percentile (4)B · 50th percentile (4)
Operating Weight
median 6,834 lbA · 20th percentile (4,512 lb)B · 16th percentile (4,200 lb)
Length
median 137 inA · 27th percentile (127 in)B · 29th percentile (129 in)
A · IB · ChallengerMedian Standard Tread Tractor