KubotaModel A
Kubota M9540
Utility
- power
- 95 hp
- displacement
- 230 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 8
Head to head · Utility
Kubota M9540 vs New Holland TD5020
New HollandModel B
New Holland TD5020
Utility
- power
- 72 hp
- displacement
- 195 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 20
KubotaKubota M9540
vs
New HollandNew Holland TD5020
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ M9540 higher · +23 hp (+32%)M954095 hp
TD502072 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
M9540 is in the 81st percentile; TD5020 is in the 65th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ M9540 higher · +35 ci (+18%)M9540230 ci
TD5020195 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
M9540 is in the 62nd percentile; TD5020 is in the 52nd · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedM95404
TD50204
Median Utility Tractor4
M9540 is in the 50th percentile; TD5020 is in the 50th · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
▲ TD5020 higher · +12 (+150%)M95408
TD502020
Median Utility Tractor12
M9540 is in the 23rd percentile; TD5020 is in the 86th · 4,941 models
M9540 (A)TD5020 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Kubota M9540 | New Holland TD5020 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Kubota | New Holland | — |
| Model | M9540 | TD5020 | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Kubota M9540 | New Holland TD5020 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Kubota | FPT | — |
| Model | V3800-DI-T | F5C | — |
| Power Output | 95hp | 72hp | ▲ M9540+23 hp · +32% |
| Rated RPM | 2,600RPM | 2,500RPM | ▲ M9540+100 RPM · +4% |
| Cylinders | 4 | 4 | Same |
| Displacement | 230ci | 195ci | ▲ M9540+35 ci · +18% |
| Bore | 3.9in | 3.9in | Same |
| Stroke | 4.7in | 4.1in | ▲ M9540+0.6 in · +15% |
Transmission
| Spec | Kubota M9540 | New Holland TD5020 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Partially synchronized (Synchro-Shuttle), Power shuttle | Partially synchronized mechanical shuttle / Creeper | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Kubota M9540 | New Holland TD5020 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 148in | 162in | ▲ TD5020+14 in · +9% |
| Width | 78in | Not recorded | — |
| Height | 97.6in | Not recorded | — |
| Operating Weight | 5,093lb | Not recorded | — |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Kubota M9540 | New Holland TD5020 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open center | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Hydrostatic power | Same |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | Kubota M9540 | New Holland TD5020 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Independent | Not recorded | — |
| Speed 1 | 540rpm | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Kubota M9540 | New Holland TD5020 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Three-point hitch | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Category | II | 3 | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Capacity | 5,500lb | 11,900lb | ▲ TD5020+6,400 lb · +116% |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Kubota M9540 | New Holland TD5020 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | 4x2 2WD | — |
| Drive Type | MFWD 4WD | 2WD | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Hydrostatic power | Same |
| Brake Type | Hydraulic wet disc | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Kubota M9540 | New Holland TD5020 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Capacities
| Spec | Kubota M9540 | New Holland TD5020 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 2.4gal | Not recorded | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | Kubota M9540 | New Holland TD5020 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Two-post foldable ROPS | ROPS / Cab options | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 81st percentile (95 hp)B · 65th percentile (72 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 62nd percentile (230 ci)B · 52nd percentile (195 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 50th percentile (4)B · 50th percentile (4)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 23rd percentile (8)B · 86th percentile (20)
Length
median 137 inA · 64th percentile (148 in)B · 80th percentile (162 in)
A · M9540B · TD5020Median Utility Tractor