Head to head · Sub-Compact
Lanz 200 vs Massey Ferguson GC1715
Massey FergusonModel B
Massey Ferguson GC1715
Utility
- power
- 25 hp
- displacement
- 68.5 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
LanzLanz 200
vs
Massey FergusonMassey Ferguson GC1715
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Sub-Compact
Engine Power
= Effectively tied20025 hp
GC171525 hp
Median Sub-Compact Tractor26.9 hp
200 is in the 46th percentile; GC1715 is in the 46th · 816 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 200 higher · +13.9 ci (+20%)20082.4 ci
GC171568.5 ci
Median Sub-Compact Tractor91.4 ci
200 is in the 43rd percentile; GC1715 is in the 29th · 757 models
Cylinders
▲ GC1715 higher · +1 (+50%)2002
GC17153
Median Sub-Compact Tractor3
200 is in the 11th percentile; GC1715 is in the 50th · 802 models
Operating Weight
▲ 200 higher · +1,822 lb (+127%)2003,255 lb
GC17151,433 lb
Median Sub-Compact Tractor2,700 lb
200 is in the 61st percentile; GC1715 is in the 17th · 711 models
200 (A)GC1715 (B)Median Sub-Compact Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Lanz 200 | Massey Ferguson GC1715 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Lanz | Massey Ferguson | — |
| Model | 200 | GC1715 | — |
| Category | Sub-Compact | Utility, Sub-Compact | — |
Engine
| Spec | Lanz 200 | Massey Ferguson GC1715 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | John Deere | Iseki | — |
| Power Output | 25hp | 25hp | Same |
| Rated RPM | 2,500RPM | 3,000RPM | ▲ GC1715+500 RPM · +20% |
| Cylinders | 2 | 3 | ▲ GC1715+1 · +50% |
| Displacement | 82.4ci | 68.5ci | ▲ 200+13.9 ci · +20% |
| Bore | 3.9in | 3.1in | ▲ 200+0.8 in · +26% |
| Stroke | 3.5in | 3.1in | ▲ 200+0.4 in · +13% |
Transmission
| Spec | Lanz 200 | Massey Ferguson GC1715 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Gear | Hydrostatic | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Lanz 200 | Massey Ferguson GC1715 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 123in | 97.2in | ▲ 200+25.8 in · +27% |
| Width | 60in | 47.2in | ▲ 200+12.8 in · +27% |
| Height | 56.5in | 72.4in | ▲ GC1715+15.9 in · +28% |
| Operating Weight | 3,255lb | 1,433lb | ▲ 200+1,822 lb · +127% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Lanz 200 | Massey Ferguson GC1715 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Not recorded | Open center | — |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Hydrostatic power | — |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | Lanz 200 | Massey Ferguson GC1715 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | 540/1000 | Independent | — |
| Speed 1 | 540rpm | 2,000rpm | ▲ GC1715+1,460 rpm · +270% |
| Speed 2 | 1,000rpm | 540rpm | ▲ 200+460 rpm · +85% |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Lanz 200 | Massey Ferguson GC1715 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Not recorded | Category I | — |
| Hitch Position | Not recorded | Rear | — |
| Hitch Capacity | Not recorded | 1,190lb | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Lanz 200 | Massey Ferguson GC1715 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | Not recorded | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | — |
| Drive Type | Not recorded | 4WD | — |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Hydrostatic power | — |
| Brake Type | Not recorded | Wet disc | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Lanz 200 | Massey Ferguson GC1715 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Capacities
| Spec | Lanz 200 | Massey Ferguson GC1715 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 1.7gal | Not recorded | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | Lanz 200 | Massey Ferguson GC1715 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | Two-post ROPS | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 26.9 hpA · 46th percentile (25 hp)B · 46th percentile (25 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 91.4 ciA · 43rd percentile (82.4 ci)B · 29th percentile (68.5 ci)
Cylinders
median 3A · 11th percentile (2)B · 50th percentile (3)
Operating Weight
median 2,700 lbA · 61st percentile (3,255 lb)B · 17th percentile (1,433 lb)
Length
median 113 inA · 65th percentile (123 in)B · 25th percentile (97.2 in)
A · 200B · GC1715Median Sub-Compact Tractor