MarshallModel A
Marshall 264
Utility
- power
- 25.8 hp
- displacement
- 68.4 ci
- Cylinders
- 2
- Forward gears
- 12
Head to head · Utility
Marshall 264 vs Massey Ferguson 210
Image not recorded
Massey FergusonModel B
Massey Ferguson 210
Utility
- power
- 25 hp
- displacement
- 77.1 ci
- Cylinders
- 2
- Forward gears
- 12
MarshallMarshall 264
vs
Massey FergusonMassey Ferguson 210
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ 264 higher · +0.8 hp (+3%)26425.8 hp
21025 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
264 is in the 17th percentile; 210 is in the 16th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 210 higher · +8.7 ci (+13%)26468.4 ci
21077.1 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
264 is in the 8th percentile; 210 is in the 11th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tied2642
2102
Median Utility Tractor4
264 is in the 3rd percentile; 210 is in the 3rd · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
= Effectively tied26412
21012
Median Utility Tractor12
264 is in the 50th percentile; 210 is in the 50th · 4,941 models
264 (A)210 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Marshall 264 | Massey Ferguson 210 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Marshall | Massey Ferguson | — |
| Model | 264 | 210 | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Marshall 264 | Massey Ferguson 210 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Lombardini | Toyosha | — |
| Model | 9LD561-2 | P126 | — |
| Power Output | 25.8hp | 25hp | ▲ 264+0.8 hp · +3% |
| Rated RPM | 3,000RPM | 2,500RPM | ▲ 264+500 RPM · +20% |
| Cylinders | 2 | 2 | Same |
| Displacement | 68.4ci | 77.1ci | ▲ 210+8.7 ci · +13% |
| Bore | 3.5in | 3.6in | ▲ 210+0.1 in · +3% |
| Stroke | 3.5in | 3.7in | ▲ 210+0.2 in · +6% |
Transmission
| Spec | Marshall 264 | Massey Ferguson 210 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Gear | gear | Same |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Marshall 264 | Massey Ferguson 210 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 86in | Not recorded | — |
| Width | 39.4in | Not recorded | — |
| Height | 46.5in | Not recorded | — |
| Operating Weight | 1,545lb | 2,325lb | ▲ 210+780 lb · +50% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Marshall 264 | Massey Ferguson 210 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open Center | open center | Same |
| Steering Type | Manual | Not recorded | — |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | Marshall 264 | Massey Ferguson 210 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | 540 (1.375) | — |
Tires
| Spec | Marshall 264 | Massey Ferguson 210 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Front Tire Size | 6.00-12 | Not recorded | — |
| Rear Tire Size | 8.25-16 | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Marshall 264 | Massey Ferguson 210 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Category I | Three-Point Hitch | — |
| Hitch Category | Not recorded | I | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Rear | Same |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Marshall 264 | Massey Ferguson 210 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | Not recorded | — |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Manual | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Marshall 264 | Massey Ferguson 210 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Not recorded | — |
Capacities
| Spec | Marshall 264 | Massey Ferguson 210 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | Not recorded | 1.3gal | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | Marshall 264 | Massey Ferguson 210 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Open | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 17th percentile (25.8 hp)B · 16th percentile (25 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 8th percentile (68.4 ci)B · 11th percentile (77.1 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 3rd percentile (2)B · 3rd percentile (2)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 50th percentile (12)B · 50th percentile (12)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 7th percentile (1,545 lb)B · 15th percentile (2,325 lb)
A · 264B · 210Median Utility Tractor