Image not recorded
McCormick IntlModel A
McCormick Intl CT36
Utility
- power
- 38 hp
- displacement
- 107 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 12
Head to head · Utility
McCormick Intl CT36 vs McCormick Intl X10.40H
Image not recorded
McCormick IntlModel B
McCormick Intl X10.40H
Utility
- power
- 41 hp
- displacement
- 122 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
McCormick IntlMcCormick Intl CT36
vs
McCormick IntlMcCormick Intl X10.40H
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ X10.40H higher · +3 hp (+8%)CT3638 hp
X10.40H41 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
CT36 is in the 31st percentile; X10.40H is in the 35th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ X10.40H higher · +15 ci (+14%)CT36107 ci
X10.40H122 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
CT36 is in the 25th percentile; X10.40H is in the 29th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedCT364
X10.40H4
Median Utility Tractor4
CT36 is in the 50th percentile; X10.40H is in the 50th · 5,720 models
Operating Weight
▲ X10.40H higher · +1,239 lb (+46%)CT362,711 lb
X10.40H3,950 lb
Median Utility Tractor5,303 lb
CT36 is in the 19th percentile; X10.40H is in the 36th · 5,107 models
CT36 (A)X10.40H (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | McCormick Intl CT36 | McCormick Intl X10.40H | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | McCormick Intl | McCormick Intl | Same |
| Model | CT36 | X10.40H | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | McCormick Intl CT36 | McCormick Intl X10.40H | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Mitsubishi | Daedong | — |
| Model | Not recorded | 4A200 | — |
| Power Output | 38hp | 41hp | ▲ X10.40H+3 hp · +8% |
| Rated RPM | 2,600RPM | 2,600RPM | Same |
| Cylinders | 4 | 4 | Same |
| Displacement | 107ci | 122ci | ▲ X10.40H+15 ci · +14% |
| Bore | 3.1in | Not recorded | — |
| Stroke | 3.6in | Not recorded | — |
Transmission
| Spec | McCormick Intl CT36 | McCormick Intl X10.40H | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | Hydrostatic | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | McCormick Intl CT36 | McCormick Intl X10.40H | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 118in | 134in | ▲ X10.40H+16 in · +14% |
| Width | 66.5in | 63.9in | ▲ CT36+2.6 in · +4% |
| Height | 89.8in | 95in | ▲ X10.40H+5.2 in · +6% |
| Operating Weight | 2,711lb | 3,950lb | ▲ X10.40H+1,239 lb · +46% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | McCormick Intl CT36 | McCormick Intl X10.40H | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Not recorded | Gear pump | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Hydrostatic power | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | McCormick Intl CT36 | McCormick Intl X10.40H | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Category I | Rear Type I | — |
| Hitch Category | Category 3 | Category 3 | Same |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Rear | Same |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | McCormick Intl CT36 | McCormick Intl X10.40H | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | Same |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD | Same |
| Steering Type | Power | Hydrostatic power | — |
Electrical
| Spec | McCormick Intl CT36 | McCormick Intl X10.40H | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Operator Station
| Spec | McCormick Intl CT36 | McCormick Intl X10.40H | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | ROPS | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 31st percentile (38 hp)B · 35th percentile (41 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 25th percentile (107 ci)B · 29th percentile (122 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 50th percentile (4)B · 50th percentile (4)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 19th percentile (2,711 lb)B · 36th percentile (3,950 lb)
Length
median 137 inA · 25th percentile (118 in)B · 46th percentile (134 in)
A · CT36B · X10.40HMedian Utility Tractor