Head to head · Sub-Compact

Mitsubishi MT365 vs Rhino 342

Image not recorded
MitsubishiModel A

Mitsubishi MT365

Sub-Compact

power
36 hp
displacement
Not recorded
Cylinders
Not recorded
Forward gears
16
Full MT365 specs
Rhino 342 Tractor
RhinoModel B

Rhino 342

Agricultural

power
34 hp
displacement
Not recorded
Cylinders
Not recorded
Forward gears
Not recorded
Full 342 specs
MitsubishiMitsubishi MT365
vs
RhinoRhino 342

How they compare

Headline specs vs. the whole Sub-Compact

n = 816–816

Engine Power

▲ MT365 higher · +2 hp (+6%)
MT36536 hp
34234 hp
Median Sub-Compact Tractor26.9 hp

MT365 is in the 68th percentile; 342 is in the 62nd · 816 models

MT365 (A)342 (B)Median Sub-Compact Tractor

Full comparison

Every spec, side by side

General Information

SpecMitsubishi MT365Rhino 342Difference
ManufacturerMitsubishiRhino—
ModelMT365342—
CategorySub-CompactAgricultural—

Engine

SpecMitsubishi MT365Rhino 342Difference
ManufacturerMitsubishiNot recorded—
ModelMT365Not recorded—
Power Output36hp34hp▲ MT365+2 hp · +6%

Hitch & Towing

SpecMitsubishi MT365Rhino 342Difference
Hitch CategoryNot recordedIII—

Chassis & Drive

SpecMitsubishi MT365Rhino 342Difference
Chassis TypeNot recorded4x2 2WD—
Drive TypeNot recorded2WD—

Electrical

SpecMitsubishi MT365Rhino 342Difference
Battery Voltage12VNot recorded—
Starter TypeElectricNot recorded—

Category context

Both models against the field

Engine Power

median 26.9 hp
A · 68th percentile (36 hp)B · 62nd percentile (34 hp)
A · MT365B · 342Median Sub-Compact Tractor
Full spec pageMitsubishi MT365Full spec pageRhino 342