Head to head · Sub-Compact

Mitsubishi MT365 vs Rhino 344

Image not recorded
MitsubishiModel A

Mitsubishi MT365

Sub-Compact

power
36 hp
displacement
Not recorded
Cylinders
Not recorded
Forward gears
16
Full MT365 specs
Image not recorded
RhinoModel B

Rhino 344

Agricultural

power
34 hp
displacement
Not recorded
Cylinders
Not recorded
Forward gears
Not recorded
Full 344 specs
MitsubishiMitsubishi MT365
vs
RhinoRhino 344

How they compare

Headline specs vs. the whole Sub-Compact

n = 816–816

Engine Power

▲ MT365 higher · +2 hp (+6%)
MT36536 hp
34434 hp
Median Sub-Compact Tractor26.9 hp

MT365 is in the 68th percentile; 344 is in the 62nd · 816 models

MT365 (A)344 (B)Median Sub-Compact Tractor

Full comparison

Every spec, side by side

General Information

SpecMitsubishi MT365Rhino 344Difference
ManufacturerMitsubishiRhino—
ModelMT365344—
CategorySub-CompactAgricultural—

Engine

SpecMitsubishi MT365Rhino 344Difference
ManufacturerMitsubishiNot recorded—
ModelMT365Not recorded—
Power Output36hp34hp▲ MT365+2 hp · +6%

Chassis & Drive

SpecMitsubishi MT365Rhino 344Difference
Chassis TypeNot recorded4x4 MFWD 4WD—
Drive TypeNot recorded4WD—

Electrical

SpecMitsubishi MT365Rhino 344Difference
Battery Voltage12VNot recorded—
Starter TypeElectricNot recorded—

Category context

Both models against the field

Engine Power

median 26.9 hp
A · 68th percentile (36 hp)B · 62nd percentile (34 hp)
A · MT365B · 344Median Sub-Compact Tractor
Full spec pageMitsubishi MT365Full spec pageRhino 344