Image not recorded
Head to head · Utility
AGCO GT65 vs CaseIH Farmall 75A
CaseIHModel B
CaseIH Farmall 75A
Utility
- power
- 74 hp
- displacement
- 195 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
AGCOAGCO GT65
vs
CaseIHCaseIH Farmall 75A
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ Farmall 75A higher · +3 hp (+4%)GT6571 hp
Farmall 75A74 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
GT65 is in the 64th percentile; Farmall 75A is in the 66th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ GT65 higher · +49 ci (+25%)GT65244 ci
Farmall 75A195 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
GT65 is in the 68th percentile; Farmall 75A is in the 52nd · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedGT654
Farmall 75A4
Median Utility Tractor4
GT65 is in the 50th percentile; Farmall 75A is in the 50th · 5,720 models
Width
▲ Farmall 75A higher · +1.7 in (+2%)GT6576.7 in
Farmall 75A78.4 in
Median Utility Tractor66 in
GT65 is in the 74th percentile; Farmall 75A is in the 79th · 3,933 models
GT65 (A)Farmall 75A (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | CaseIH Farmall 75A | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | AGCO | CaseIH | — |
| Model | GT65 | Farmall 75A | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | CaseIH Farmall 75A | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | SAME Deutz-Fahr | FPT | — |
| Power Output | 71hp | 74hp | ▲ Farmall 75A+3 hp · +4% |
| Rated RPM | 2,200RPM | 2,500RPM | ▲ Farmall 75A+300 RPM · +14% |
| Cylinders | 4 | 4 | Same |
| Displacement | 244ci | 195ci | ▲ GT65+49 ci · +25% |
| Bore | 4.1in | 4.1in | Same |
| Stroke | 4.5in | 4.5in | Same |
Transmission
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | CaseIH Farmall 75A | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Synchro-shuttle | 8-speed partially synchronized | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | CaseIH Farmall 75A | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 152in | Not recorded | — |
| Width | 76.7in | 78.4in | ▲ Farmall 75A+1.7 in · +2% |
| Height | 106in | Not recorded | — |
| Operating Weight | 5,335lb | Not recorded | — |
Hydraulics
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | CaseIH Farmall 75A | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open center | Open center | Same |
| Steering Type | Power | Hydrostatic power | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | CaseIH Farmall 75A | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Three-Point Hitch | II/I | — |
| Hitch Category | II | II/I | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Rear | Same |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | CaseIH Farmall 75A | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | 4x2 2WD | Same |
| Drive Type | 2WD | 2WD | Same |
| Steering Type | Power | Hydrostatic power | — |
Electrical
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | CaseIH Farmall 75A | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Capacities
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | CaseIH Farmall 75A | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | Not recorded | 2.1gal | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | AGCO GT65 | CaseIH Farmall 75A | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | ROPS | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 64th percentile (71 hp)B · 66th percentile (74 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 68th percentile (244 ci)B · 52nd percentile (195 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 50th percentile (4)B · 50th percentile (4)
Width
median 66 inA · 74th percentile (76.7 in)B · 79th percentile (78.4 in)
A · GT65B · Farmall 75AMedian Utility Tractor