Image not recorded
AGCOModel A
AGCO RT110A
Row Crop
- power
- 117 hp
- displacement
- 403 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 24
Head to head · Row Crop
AGCO RT110A vs CaseIH Puma 115
CaseIHModel B
CaseIH Puma 115
Utility
- power
- 115 hp
- displacement
- 411 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 18
AGCOAGCO RT110A
vs
CaseIHCaseIH Puma 115
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Row Crop
Engine Power
▲ RT110A higher · +2 hp (+2%)RT110A117 hp
Puma 115115 hp
Median Row Crop Tractor138 hp
RT110A is in the 36th percentile; Puma 115 is in the 35th · 1,206 models
Engine Displacement
▲ Puma 115 higher · +8 ci (+2%)RT110A403 ci
Puma 115411 ci
Median Row Crop Tractor391 ci
RT110A is in the 54th percentile; Puma 115 is in the 63rd · 1,409 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedRT110A6
Puma 1156
Median Row Crop Tractor6
RT110A is in the 50th percentile; Puma 115 is in the 50th · 1,417 models
Forward Gears
▲ RT110A higher · +6 (+33%)RT110A24
Puma 11518
Median Row Crop Tractor16
RT110A is in the 81st percentile; Puma 115 is in the 61st · 1,200 models
RT110A (A)Puma 115 (B)Median Row Crop Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | AGCO RT110A | CaseIH Puma 115 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | AGCO | CaseIH | — |
| Model | RT110A | Puma 115 | — |
| Category | Row Crop | Utility | — |
Engine
| Spec | AGCO RT110A | CaseIH Puma 115 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | SisuDiesel | CNH | — |
| Model | 66CTA | Not recorded | — |
| Power Output | 117hp | 115hp | ▲ RT110A+2 hp · +2% |
| Rated RPM | 2,200RPM | 2,200RPM | Same |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 | Same |
| Displacement | 403ci | 411ci | ▲ Puma 115+8 ci · +2% |
| Bore | 4.3in | 4.1in | ▲ RT110A+0.2 in · +5% |
| Stroke | 4.7in | 5.2in | ▲ Puma 115+0.5 in · +11% |
Transmission
| Spec | AGCO RT110A | CaseIH Puma 115 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Selective gear fixed ratio with partial (6) range operator controlled powershift | 18-speed partial power shift | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | AGCO RT110A | CaseIH Puma 115 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 171in | Not recorded | — |
| Width | 78.4in | Not recorded | — |
| Height | 114in | 118in | ▲ Puma 115+4 in · +4% |
| Operating Weight | 12,200lb | 13,230lb | ▲ Puma 115+1,030 lb · +8% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | AGCO RT110A | CaseIH Puma 115 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Closed center pressure flow compensated (PFC) | Closed center pressure flow compensated (PFC) | Same |
| Steering Type | Power | Hydrostatic Power | — |
Tires
| Spec | AGCO RT110A | CaseIH Puma 115 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Front Tire Size | 16.9R28 | Not recorded | — |
| Rear Tire Size | 480/80R42 | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | AGCO RT110A | CaseIH Puma 115 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Not recorded | 2/3N | — |
| Hitch Category | 2 | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | AGCO RT110A | CaseIH Puma 115 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4WD | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | — |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD | Same |
| Steering Type | Power | Hydrostatic Power | — |
| Brake Type | Multiple wet disc hydraulically operated by two foot pedals | Hydraulic wet disc | — |
Electrical
| Spec | AGCO RT110A | CaseIH Puma 115 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric starter | Electric | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | AGCO RT110A | CaseIH Puma 115 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Cab | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 138 hpA · 36th percentile (117 hp)B · 35th percentile (115 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 391 ciA · 54th percentile (403 ci)B · 63rd percentile (411 ci)
Cylinders
median 6A · 50th percentile (6)B · 50th percentile (6)
Forward Gears
median 16A · 81st percentile (24)B · 61st percentile (18)
Operating Weight
median 12,307 lbA · 50th percentile (12,200 lb)B · 58th percentile (13,230 lb)
A · RT110AB · Puma 115Median Row Crop Tractor