Image not recorded
AGCOModel A
AGCO RT140A
Utility
- power
- 180 hp
- displacement
- 402 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 32
Head to head · Row Crop
AGCO RT140A vs CaseIH Puma 180
Image not recorded
CaseIHModel B
CaseIH Puma 180
Row Crop
- power
- 180 hp
- displacement
- 411 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 19
AGCOAGCO RT140A
vs
CaseIHCaseIH Puma 180
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Row Crop
Engine Power
= Effectively tiedRT140A180 hp
Puma 180180 hp
Median Row Crop Tractor138 hp
RT140A is in the 69th percentile; Puma 180 is in the 70th · 1,206 models
Engine Displacement
▲ Puma 180 higher · +9 ci (+2%)RT140A402 ci
Puma 180411 ci
Median Row Crop Tractor391 ci
RT140A is in the 52nd percentile; Puma 180 is in the 63rd · 1,409 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedRT140A6
Puma 1806
Median Row Crop Tractor6
RT140A is in the 50th percentile; Puma 180 is in the 50th · 1,417 models
Forward Gears
▲ RT140A higher · +13 (+68%)RT140A32
Puma 18019
Median Row Crop Tractor16
RT140A is in the 91st percentile; Puma 180 is in the 68th · 1,200 models
RT140A (A)Puma 180 (B)Median Row Crop Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | AGCO RT140A | CaseIH Puma 180 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | AGCO | CaseIH | — |
| Model | RT140A | Puma 180 | — |
| Category | Utility, Row Crop | Row Crop | — |
Engine
| Spec | AGCO RT140A | CaseIH Puma 180 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | SisuDiesel | CNH | — |
| Model | 66CTA | Not recorded | — |
| Power Output | 180hp | 180hp | Same |
| Rated RPM | 2,200RPM | 2,200RPM | Same |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 | Same |
| Displacement | 402ci | 411ci | ▲ Puma 180+9 ci · +2% |
| Bore | Not recorded | 4.1in | — |
| Stroke | Not recorded | 5.2in | — |
Transmission
| Spec | AGCO RT140A | CaseIH Puma 180 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | CVT | Full power shift | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | AGCO RT140A | CaseIH Puma 180 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 196in | Not recorded | — |
| Width | 79.1in | Not recorded | — |
| Height | 119in | 123in | ▲ Puma 180+4 in · +3% |
| Operating Weight | 16,305lb | 17,595lb | ▲ Puma 180+1,290 lb · +8% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | AGCO RT140A | CaseIH Puma 180 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Closed Center Pressure Flow Compensated (PFC) | Pressure flow compensating (PFC) | — |
| Pump Flow Capacity | 30.5gpm | Not recorded | — |
| Pressure | 2,845psi | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Hydrostatic Power | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | AGCO RT140A | CaseIH Puma 180 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Three-Point Hitch | Rear Type: II/IIIN | — |
| Hitch Category | 3/3N | II/IIIN | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Rear | Same |
| Hitch Capacity | 17,335lb | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | AGCO RT140A | CaseIH Puma 180 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | 4x2 2WD | Same |
| Drive Type | 2WD | 2WD | Same |
| Steering Type | Power | Hydrostatic Power | — |
Electrical
| Spec | AGCO RT140A | CaseIH Puma 180 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Voltage | 12V | 12V | Same |
| Starter Type | Not recorded | Electric | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | AGCO RT140A | CaseIH Puma 180 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Cab | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 138 hpA · 69th percentile (180 hp)B · 70th percentile (180 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 391 ciA · 52nd percentile (402 ci)B · 63rd percentile (411 ci)
Cylinders
median 6A · 50th percentile (6)B · 50th percentile (6)
Forward Gears
median 16A · 91st percentile (32)B · 68th percentile (19)
Operating Weight
median 12,307 lbA · 71st percentile (16,305 lb)B · 75th percentile (17,595 lb)
A · RT140AB · Puma 180Median Row Crop Tractor