Head to head · Utility
AGCO ST30x vs CaseIH Farmall DX29
Image not recorded
CaseIHModel B
CaseIH Farmall DX29
Utility
- power
- 29 hp
- displacement
- 81.2 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
AGCOAGCO ST30x
vs
CaseIHCaseIH Farmall DX29
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ Farmall DX29 higher · +0.6 hp (+2%)ST30x28.4 hp
Farmall DX2929 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
ST30x is in the 20th percentile; Farmall DX29 is in the 21st · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ ST30x higher · +8.1 ci (+10%)ST30x89.3 ci
Farmall DX2981.2 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
ST30x is in the 15th percentile; Farmall DX29 is in the 13th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedST30x3
Farmall DX293
Median Utility Tractor4
ST30x is in the 23rd percentile; Farmall DX29 is in the 23rd · 5,720 models
Operating Weight
▲ Farmall DX29 higher · +490 lb (+25%)ST30x1,984 lb
Farmall DX292,474 lb
Median Utility Tractor5,303 lb
ST30x is in the 12th percentile; Farmall DX29 is in the 16th · 5,107 models
ST30x (A)Farmall DX29 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | AGCO ST30x | CaseIH Farmall DX29 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | AGCO | CaseIH | — |
| Model | ST30x | Farmall DX29 | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | AGCO ST30x | CaseIH Farmall DX29 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Iseki | Shibaura | — |
| Model | E3CF | Not recorded | — |
| Power Output | 28.4hp | 29hp | ▲ Farmall DX29+0.6 hp · +2% |
| Rated RPM | 2,500RPM | 2,800RPM | ▲ Farmall DX29+300 RPM · +12% |
| Cylinders | 3 | 3 | Same |
| Displacement | 89.3ci | 81.2ci | ▲ ST30x+8.1 ci · +10% |
| Bore | 3.4in | Not recorded | — |
| Stroke | 3.3in | Not recorded | — |
Transmission
| Spec | AGCO ST30x | CaseIH Farmall DX29 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Gear | Hydrostatic | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | AGCO ST30x | CaseIH Farmall DX29 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 117in | Not recorded | — |
| Width | 55.6in | Not recorded | — |
| Height | 79.3in | Not recorded | — |
| Wheelbase | Not recorded | 63in | — |
| Operating Weight | 1,984lb | 2,474lb | ▲ Farmall DX29+490 lb · +25% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | AGCO ST30x | CaseIH Farmall DX29 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open Center | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Hydrostatic power | Same |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | AGCO ST30x | CaseIH Farmall DX29 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Independent | Not recorded | — |
| Speed 1 | 540rpm | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | AGCO ST30x | CaseIH Farmall DX29 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Category I | Rear Type I | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | AGCO ST30x | CaseIH Farmall DX29 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | Not recorded | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | — |
| Drive Type | 2WD | 4WD | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Hydrostatic power | Same |
Electrical
| Spec | AGCO ST30x | CaseIH Farmall DX29 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Not recorded | — |
Capacities
| Spec | AGCO ST30x | CaseIH Farmall DX29 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 1.9gal | Not recorded | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | AGCO ST30x | CaseIH Farmall DX29 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | ROPS | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 20th percentile (28.4 hp)B · 21st percentile (29 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 15th percentile (89.3 ci)B · 13th percentile (81.2 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 23rd percentile (3)B · 23rd percentile (3)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 12th percentile (1,984 lb)B · 16th percentile (2,474 lb)
A · ST30xB · Farmall DX29Median Utility Tractor