Image not recorded
Allis ChalmersModel A
Allis Chalmers D10
Row Crop
- power
- 28.6 hp
- displacement
- 139 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 4
Head to head · Row Crop
Allis Chalmers D10 vs CaseIH Farmall DX29
Image not recorded
CaseIHModel B
CaseIH Farmall DX29
Utility
- power
- 29 hp
- displacement
- 81.2 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
Allis ChalmersAllis Chalmers D10
vs
CaseIHCaseIH Farmall DX29
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Row Crop
Engine Power
▲ Farmall DX29 higher · +0.4 hp (+1%)D1028.6 hp
Farmall DX2929 hp
Median Row Crop Tractor138 hp
D10 is in the 2nd percentile; Farmall DX29 is in the 2nd · 1,206 models
Engine Displacement
▲ D10 higher · +57.8 ci (+71%)D10139 ci
Farmall DX2981.2 ci
Median Row Crop Tractor391 ci
D10 is in the 3rd percentile; Farmall DX29 is in the 1st · 1,409 models
Cylinders
▲ D10 higher · +1 (+33%)D104
Farmall DX293
Median Row Crop Tractor6
D10 is in the 17th percentile; Farmall DX29 is in the 2nd · 1,417 models
Operating Weight
▲ D10 higher · +226 lb (+9%)D102,700 lb
Farmall DX292,474 lb
Median Row Crop Tractor12,307 lb
D10 is in the 1st percentile; Farmall DX29 is in the 1st · 1,350 models
D10 (A)Farmall DX29 (B)Median Row Crop Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Allis Chalmers D10 | CaseIH Farmall DX29 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Allis Chalmers | CaseIH | — |
| Model | D10 | Farmall DX29 | — |
| Category | Row Crop | Utility | — |
Engine
| Spec | Allis Chalmers D10 | CaseIH Farmall DX29 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Allis-Chalmers | Shibaura | — |
| Model | Power-Crater | Not recorded | — |
| Power Output | 28.6hp | 29hp | ▲ Farmall DX29+0.4 hp · +1% |
| Rated RPM | 1,650RPM | 2,800RPM | ▲ Farmall DX29+1,150 RPM · +70% |
| Cylinders | 4 | 3 | ▲ D10+1 · +33% |
| Displacement | 139ci | 81.2ci | ▲ D10+57.8 ci · +71% |
| Bore | 3.4in | Not recorded | — |
| Stroke | 3.9in | Not recorded | — |
Transmission
| Spec | Allis Chalmers D10 | CaseIH Farmall DX29 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Sliding Gear | Hydrostatic | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Allis Chalmers D10 | CaseIH Farmall DX29 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 121in | Not recorded | — |
| Height | 76in | Not recorded | — |
| Wheelbase | Not recorded | 63in | — |
| Operating Weight | 2,700lb | 2,474lb | ▲ D10+226 lb · +9% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Allis Chalmers D10 | CaseIH Farmall DX29 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Live | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Manual | Hydrostatic power | — |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | Allis Chalmers D10 | CaseIH Farmall DX29 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Transmission | Not recorded | — |
| Speed 1 | 540rpm | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Allis Chalmers D10 | CaseIH Farmall DX29 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Snap-Coupler | Rear Type I | — |
| Hitch Category | I | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Allis Chalmers D10 | CaseIH Farmall DX29 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | — |
| Drive Type | 2WD | 4WD | — |
| Steering Type | Manual | Hydrostatic power | — |
| Brake Type | Differential Mechanical Shoe | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Allis Chalmers D10 | CaseIH Farmall DX29 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Not recorded | — |
Capacities
| Spec | Allis Chalmers D10 | CaseIH Farmall DX29 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 2gal | Not recorded | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | Allis Chalmers D10 | CaseIH Farmall DX29 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Open | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 138 hpA · 2nd percentile (28.6 hp)B · 2nd percentile (29 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 391 ciA · 3rd percentile (139 ci)B · 1st percentile (81.2 ci)
Cylinders
median 6A · 17th percentile (4)B · 2nd percentile (3)
Operating Weight
median 12,307 lbA · 1st percentile (2,700 lb)B · 1st percentile (2,474 lb)
A · D10B · Farmall DX29Median Row Crop Tractor