Image not recorded
Allis ChalmersModel A
Allis Chalmers D272
Utility
- power
- 27.5 hp
- displacement
- 125 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 3
Head to head · Utility
Allis Chalmers D272 vs Ford 1620
Image not recorded
FordModel B
Ford 1620
Utility
- power
- 27.4 hp
- displacement
- 81.2 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
Allis ChalmersAllis Chalmers D272
vs
FordFord 1620
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ D272 higher · +0.1 hp (<1%)D27227.5 hp
162027.4 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
D272 is in the 19th percentile; 1620 is in the 19th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ D272 higher · +43.8 ci (+54%)D272125 ci
162081.2 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
D272 is in the 30th percentile; 1620 is in the 13th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
▲ D272 higher · +1 (+33%)D2724
16203
Median Utility Tractor4
D272 is in the 50th percentile; 1620 is in the 23rd · 5,720 models
Operating Weight
▲ 1620 higher · +173 lb (+8%)D2722,060 lb
16202,233 lb
Median Utility Tractor5,303 lb
D272 is in the 13th percentile; 1620 is in the 14th · 5,107 models
D272 (A)1620 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Allis Chalmers D272 | Ford 1620 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Allis Chalmers | Ford | — |
| Model | D272 | 1620 | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Allis Chalmers D272 | Ford 1620 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Allis-Chalmers | Shibaura | — |
| Model | 2.1L 4-cyl gasoline | Not recorded | — |
| Power Output | 27.5hp | 27.4hp | ▲ D272+0.1 hp · <1% |
| Rated RPM | 1,650RPM | 2,600RPM | ▲ 1620+950 RPM · +58% |
| Cylinders | 4 | 3 | ▲ D272+1 · +33% |
| Displacement | 125ci | 81.2ci | ▲ D272+43.8 ci · +54% |
| Bore | 3.4in | 3.3in | ▲ D272+0.1 in · +3% |
| Stroke | 3.5in | 3.2in | ▲ D272+0.4 in · +13% |
Transmission
| Spec | Allis Chalmers D272 | Ford 1620 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Sliding gear | Hydrostatic | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Allis Chalmers D272 | Ford 1620 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 110in | 112in | ▲ 1620+2 in · +2% |
| Width | Not recorded | 48.4in | — |
| Height | 63in | 84.3in | ▲ 1620+21.3 in · +34% |
| Operating Weight | 2,060lb | 2,233lb | ▲ 1620+173 lb · +8% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Allis Chalmers D272 | Ford 1620 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Not recorded | Open center | — |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Power | — |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | Allis Chalmers D272 | Ford 1620 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | Live | — |
| Speed 1 | Not recorded | 540rpm | — |
| Speed 2 | Not recorded | 2,000rpm | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Allis Chalmers D272 | Ford 1620 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Not recorded | Three-Point Hitch | — |
| Hitch Category | Not recorded | I | — |
| Hitch Capacity | Not recorded | 1,930lb | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Allis Chalmers D272 | Ford 1620 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | 4x2 2WD | Same |
| Drive Type | 2WD | 2WD | Same |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Power | — |
| Brake Type | Not recorded | Wet disc | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Allis Chalmers D272 | Ford 1620 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Not recorded | Electric | — |
Capacities
| Spec | Allis Chalmers D272 | Ford 1620 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 2gal | Not recorded | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | Allis Chalmers D272 | Ford 1620 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | Two-post ROPS | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 19th percentile (27.5 hp)B · 19th percentile (27.4 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 30th percentile (125 ci)B · 13th percentile (81.2 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 50th percentile (4)B · 23rd percentile (3)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 13th percentile (2,060 lb)B · 14th percentile (2,233 lb)
Length
median 137 inA · 16th percentile (110 in)B · 18th percentile (112 in)
A · D272B · 1620Median Utility Tractor