Antonio CarraroModel A
Antonio Carraro TRX 7800S
Sub-Compact
- power
- 71 hp
- displacement
- 203 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 16
Head to head · Sub-Compact
Antonio Carraro TRX 7800S vs New Holland TN75FA
New HollandModel B
New Holland TN75FA
Utility
- power
- 72 hp
- displacement
- 238 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 16
Antonio CarraroAntonio Carraro TRX 7800S
vs
New HollandNew Holland TN75FA
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Sub-Compact
Engine Power
▲ TN75FA higher · +1 hp (+1%)TRX 7800S71 hp
TN75FA72 hp
Median Sub-Compact Tractor26.9 hp
TRX 7800S is in the 99th percentile; TN75FA is in the 99th · 816 models
Engine Displacement
▲ TN75FA higher · +35 ci (+17%)TRX 7800S203 ci
TN75FA238 ci
Median Sub-Compact Tractor91.4 ci
TRX 7800S is in the 97th percentile; TN75FA is in the 98th · 757 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedTRX 7800S4
TN75FA4
Median Sub-Compact Tractor3
TRX 7800S is in the 90th percentile; TN75FA is in the 90th · 802 models
Forward Gears
= Effectively tiedTRX 7800S16
TN75FA16
Median Sub-Compact Tractor9
TRX 7800S is in the 89th percentile; TN75FA is in the 89th · 616 models
TRX 7800S (A)TN75FA (B)Median Sub-Compact Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Antonio Carraro TRX 7800S | New Holland TN75FA | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Antonio Carraro | New Holland | — |
| Model | TRX 7800S | TN75FA | — |
| Category | Sub-Compact | Utility | — |
Engine
| Spec | Antonio Carraro TRX 7800S | New Holland TN75FA | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Yanmar | Not recorded | — |
| Power Output | 71hp | 72hp | ▲ TN75FA+1 hp · +1% |
| Rated RPM | 2,500RPM | 2,300RPM | ▲ TRX 7800S+200 RPM · +9% |
| Cylinders | 4 | 4 | Same |
| Displacement | 203ci | 238ci | ▲ TN75FA+35 ci · +17% |
| Bore | 3.9in | Not recorded | — |
| Stroke | 4.3in | Not recorded | — |
Transmission
| Spec | Antonio Carraro TRX 7800S | New Holland TN75FA | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | Synchro Command Plus | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Antonio Carraro TRX 7800S | New Holland TN75FA | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 134in | Not recorded | — |
| Width | 54.3in | 60in | ▲ TN75FA+5.7 in · +10% |
| Height | 93.3in | 93.6in | ▲ TN75FA+0.3 in · <1% |
| Operating Weight | 4,806lb | 5,780lb | ▲ TN75FA+974 lb · +20% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Antonio Carraro TRX 7800S | New Holland TN75FA | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Steering Type | Hydraulic Power | Not recorded | — |
Tires
| Spec | Antonio Carraro TRX 7800S | New Holland TN75FA | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rear Tire Size | Not recorded | 380/70R24 | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Antonio Carraro TRX 7800S | New Holland TN75FA | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Rear Type: I | Cat II | — |
| Hitch Category | Not recorded | II | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Rear | Same |
| Hitch Capacity | Not recorded | 4,334lb | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Antonio Carraro TRX 7800S | New Holland TN75FA | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Drive Type | Not recorded | 4WD | — |
| Steering Type | Hydraulic Power | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Antonio Carraro TRX 7800S | New Holland TN75FA | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 26.9 hpA · 99th percentile (71 hp)B · 99th percentile (72 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 91.4 ciA · 97th percentile (203 ci)B · 98th percentile (238 ci)
Cylinders
median 3A · 90th percentile (4)B · 90th percentile (4)
Forward Gears
median 9A · 89th percentile (16)B · 89th percentile (16)
Operating Weight
median 2,700 lbA · 91st percentile (4,806 lb)B · 96th percentile (5,780 lb)
A · TRX 7800SB · TN75FAMedian Sub-Compact Tractor