Head to head · Utility
Apollo 254 vs Lanz 200
ApolloApollo 254
vs
LanzLanz 200
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
= Effectively tied25425 hp
20025 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
254 is in the 16th percentile; 200 is in the 16th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 254 higher · +11.1 ci (+13%)25493.5 ci
20082.4 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
254 is in the 21st percentile; 200 is in the 14th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
▲ 254 higher · +1 (+50%)2543
2002
Median Utility Tractor4
254 is in the 23rd percentile; 200 is in the 3rd · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
▲ 254 higher · +3 (+50%)2549
2006
Median Utility Tractor12
254 is in the 35th percentile; 200 is in the 11th · 4,941 models
254 (A)200 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Apollo 254 | Lanz 200 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Apollo | Lanz | — |
| Model | 254 | 200 | — |
| Category | Utility | Sub-Compact | — |
Engine
| Spec | Apollo 254 | Lanz 200 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Changfa | John Deere | — |
| Model | CF3B25T | Not recorded | — |
| Power Output | 25hp | 25hp | Same |
| Rated RPM | 2,400RPM | 2,500RPM | ▲ 200+100 RPM · +4% |
| Cylinders | 3 | 2 | ▲ 254+1 · +50% |
| Displacement | 93.5ci | 82.4ci | ▲ 254+11.1 ci · +13% |
| Bore | Not recorded | 3.9in | — |
| Stroke | Not recorded | 3.5in | — |
Transmission
| Spec | Apollo 254 | Lanz 200 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Gear | Gear | Same |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Apollo 254 | Lanz 200 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 154in | 123in | ▲ 254+31 in · +25% |
| Width | 56.7in | 60in | ▲ 200+3.3 in · +6% |
| Height | 91.3in | 56.5in | ▲ 254+34.8 in · +62% |
| Operating Weight | Not recorded | 3,255lb | — |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Apollo 254 | Lanz 200 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Steering Type | Power | Not recorded | — |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | Apollo 254 | Lanz 200 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | 540/1000 | — |
| Speed 1 | Not recorded | 540rpm | — |
| Speed 2 | Not recorded | 1,000rpm | — |
Tires
| Spec | Apollo 254 | Lanz 200 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Front Tire Size | 6.00x16 | Not recorded | — |
| Rear Tire Size | 9.5x24 | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Apollo 254 | Lanz 200 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Three-Point Hitch | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Category | I | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Apollo 254 | Lanz 200 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | Not recorded | — |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Apollo 254 | Lanz 200 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Capacities
| Spec | Apollo 254 | Lanz 200 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | Not recorded | 1.7gal | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | Apollo 254 | Lanz 200 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | ROPS | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 16th percentile (25 hp)B · 16th percentile (25 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 21st percentile (93.5 ci)B · 14th percentile (82.4 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 23rd percentile (3)B · 3rd percentile (2)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 35th percentile (9)B · 11th percentile (6)
Length
median 137 inA · 70th percentile (154 in)B · 32nd percentile (123 in)
A · 254B · 200Median Utility Tractor