BelarusModel A
Belarus 1770
Utility
- power
- 185 hp
- displacement
- 558 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 12
Head to head · Utility
Belarus 1770 vs CaseIH Puma 180
Image not recorded
CaseIHModel B
CaseIH Puma 180
Row Crop
- power
- 180 hp
- displacement
- 411 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 19
BelarusBelarus 1770
vs
CaseIHCaseIH Puma 180
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ 1770 higher · +5 hp (+3%)1770185 hp
Puma 180180 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
1770 is in the 94th percentile; Puma 180 is in the 94th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 1770 higher · +147 ci (+36%)1770558 ci
Puma 180411 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
1770 is in the 94th percentile; Puma 180 is in the 91st · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tied17706
Puma 1806
Median Utility Tractor4
1770 is in the 93rd percentile; Puma 180 is in the 93rd · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
▲ Puma 180 higher · +7 (+58%)177012
Puma 18019
Median Utility Tractor12
1770 is in the 50th percentile; Puma 180 is in the 84th · 4,941 models
1770 (A)Puma 180 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Belarus 1770 | CaseIH Puma 180 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Belarus | CaseIH | — |
| Model | 1770 | Puma 180 | — |
| Category | Utility | Row Crop | — |
Engine
| Spec | Belarus 1770 | CaseIH Puma 180 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Belarus | CNH | — |
| Model | SMD-63 | Not recorded | — |
| Power Output | 185hp | 180hp | ▲ 1770+5 hp · +3% |
| Rated RPM | 2,100RPM | 2,200RPM | ▲ Puma 180+100 RPM · +5% |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 | Same |
| Displacement | 558ci | 411ci | ▲ 1770+147 ci · +36% |
| Bore | 5.1in | 4.1in | ▲ 1770+1 in · +24% |
| Stroke | 4.5in | 5.2in | ▲ Puma 180+0.7 in · +16% |
Transmission
| Spec | Belarus 1770 | CaseIH Puma 180 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | 12-speed four-speed power shift | Full power shift | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Belarus 1770 | CaseIH Puma 180 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 241in | Not recorded | — |
| Width | 94.5in | Not recorded | — |
| Height | 125in | 123in | ▲ 1770+2 in · +2% |
| Operating Weight | 19,585lb | 17,595lb | ▲ 1770+1,990 lb · +11% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Belarus 1770 | CaseIH Puma 180 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | open center | Pressure flow compensating (PFC) | — |
| Steering Type | articulated hydraulic power | Hydrostatic Power | — |
Tires
| Spec | Belarus 1770 | CaseIH Puma 180 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Front Tire Size | 23.1-26 | Not recorded | — |
| Rear Tire Size | 23.1-26 | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Belarus 1770 | CaseIH Puma 180 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Rear Type: III | Rear Type: II/IIIN | — |
| Hitch Category | III | II/IIIN | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Rear | Same |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Belarus 1770 | CaseIH Puma 180 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 articulated 4WD | 4x2 2WD | — |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 2WD | — |
| Steering Type | articulated hydraulic power | Hydrostatic Power | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Belarus 1770 | CaseIH Puma 180 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Voltage | Not recorded | 12V | — |
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Capacities
| Spec | Belarus 1770 | CaseIH Puma 180 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 11gal | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 94th percentile (185 hp)B · 94th percentile (180 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 94th percentile (558 ci)B · 91st percentile (411 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 93rd percentile (6)B · 93rd percentile (6)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 50th percentile (12)B · 84th percentile (19)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 95th percentile (19,585 lb)B · 94th percentile (17,595 lb)
A · 1770B · Puma 180Median Utility Tractor