Image not recorded
Head to head · Utility
Belarus 500 vs CaseIH Farmall 65C
Image not recorded
CaseIHModel B
CaseIH Farmall 65C
Utility
- power
- 64 hp
- displacement
- 195 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 16
BelarusBelarus 500
vs
CaseIHCaseIH Farmall 65C
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ 500 higher · +1 hp (+2%)50065 hp
Farmall 65C64 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
500 is in the 59th percentile; Farmall 65C is in the 57th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 500 higher · +95 ci (+49%)500290 ci
Farmall 65C195 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
500 is in the 83rd percentile; Farmall 65C is in the 52nd · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tied5004
Farmall 65C4
Median Utility Tractor4
500 is in the 50th percentile; Farmall 65C is in the 50th · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
▲ Farmall 65C higher · +7 (+78%)5009
Farmall 65C16
Median Utility Tractor12
500 is in the 35th percentile; Farmall 65C is in the 73rd · 4,941 models
500 (A)Farmall 65C (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Belarus 500 | CaseIH Farmall 65C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Belarus | CaseIH | — |
| Model | 500 | Farmall 65C | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Belarus 500 | CaseIH Farmall 65C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Belarus | Fiat Powertrain Technologies (FPT) | — |
| Power Output | 65hp | 64hp | ▲ 500+1 hp · +2% |
| Rated RPM | 1,800RPM | 2,300RPM | ▲ Farmall 65C+500 RPM · +28% |
| Cylinders | 4 | 4 | Same |
| Displacement | 290ci | 195ci | ▲ 500+95 ci · +49% |
| Bore | 4.3in | Not recorded | — |
| Stroke | 4.9in | Not recorded | — |
Transmission
| Spec | Belarus 500 | CaseIH Farmall 65C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Sliding gear | Mechanical Shuttle | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Belarus 500 | CaseIH Farmall 65C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | Not recorded | 77.8in | — |
| Operating Weight | 6,100lb | 5,776lb | ▲ 500+324 lb · +6% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Belarus 500 | CaseIH Farmall 65C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open center | Open Center | Same |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Hydrostatic power | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Belarus 500 | CaseIH Farmall 65C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Not recorded | Three-Point Hitch | — |
| Hitch Category | II | II/I | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Rear | Same |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Belarus 500 | CaseIH Farmall 65C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | 4x2 2WD | Same |
| Drive Type | 2WD | 2WD | Same |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Hydrostatic power | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Belarus 500 | CaseIH Farmall 65C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Not recorded | Electric | — |
Capacities
| Spec | Belarus 500 | CaseIH Farmall 65C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 5.4gal | Not recorded | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | Belarus 500 | CaseIH Farmall 65C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | Cab | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 59th percentile (65 hp)B · 57th percentile (64 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 83rd percentile (290 ci)B · 52nd percentile (195 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 50th percentile (4)B · 50th percentile (4)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 35th percentile (9)B · 73rd percentile (16)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 58th percentile (6,100 lb)B · 54th percentile (5,776 lb)
A · 500B · Farmall 65CMedian Utility Tractor