BobcatModel A
Bobcat CT1025
Utility
- power
- 24.5 hp
- displacement
- 69.1 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
Head to head · Utility
Bobcat CT1025 vs Ford 1000
BobcatBobcat CT1025
vs
FordFord 1000
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ 1000 higher · +0.5 hp (+2%)CT102524.5 hp
100025 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
CT1025 is in the 15th percentile; 1000 is in the 16th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 1000 higher · +8.5 ci (+12%)CT102569.1 ci
100077.6 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
CT1025 is in the 10th percentile; 1000 is in the 11th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
▲ CT1025 higher · +1 (+50%)CT10253
10002
Median Utility Tractor4
CT1025 is in the 23rd percentile; 1000 is in the 3rd · 5,720 models
Operating Weight
▲ 1000 higher · +812 lb (+55%)CT10251,488 lb
10002,300 lb
Median Utility Tractor5,303 lb
CT1025 is in the 5th percentile; 1000 is in the 14th · 5,107 models
CT1025 (A)1000 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Bobcat CT1025 | Ford 1000 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Bobcat | Ford | — |
| Model | CT1025 | 1000 | — |
| Category | Utility, Sub-Compact | Utility | — |
Engine
| Spec | Bobcat CT1025 | Ford 1000 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Daedong | Shibaura | — |
| Model | Shibaura S733L | LE892 | — |
| Power Output | 24.5hp | 25hp | ▲ 1000+0.5 hp · +2% |
| Rated RPM | 3,000RPM | 2,500RPM | ▲ CT1025+500 RPM · +20% |
| Cylinders | 3 | 2 | ▲ CT1025+1 · +50% |
| Displacement | 69.1ci | 77.6ci | ▲ 1000+8.5 ci · +12% |
| Bore | 3in | 3.5in | ▲ 1000+0.5 in · +17% |
| Stroke | 3.2in | 3.9in | ▲ 1000+0.7 in · +22% |
Transmission
| Spec | Bobcat CT1025 | Ford 1000 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Hydrostatic | Gear | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Bobcat CT1025 | Ford 1000 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 99.3in | 101in | ▲ 1000+1.7 in · +2% |
| Width | 46in | Not recorded | — |
| Height | 87.6in | 54.3in | ▲ CT1025+33.3 in · +61% |
| Operating Weight | 1,488lb | 2,300lb | ▲ 1000+812 lb · +55% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Bobcat CT1025 | Ford 1000 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Not recorded | Open Center | — |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | Bobcat CT1025 | Ford 1000 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | Transmission | — |
| Speed 1 | Not recorded | 540rpm | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Bobcat CT1025 | Ford 1000 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Rear Type: I | Category I | — |
| Hitch Category | Not recorded | I | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Bobcat CT1025 | Ford 1000 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | Not recorded | 4x2 2WD | — |
| Drive Type | Not recorded | 2WD | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Bobcat CT1025 | Ford 1000 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric Starter | — |
Capacities
| Spec | Bobcat CT1025 | Ford 1000 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | Not recorded | 1.4gal | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | Bobcat CT1025 | Ford 1000 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | Open, Optional two-post ROPS | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 15th percentile (24.5 hp)B · 16th percentile (25 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 10th percentile (69.1 ci)B · 11th percentile (77.6 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 23rd percentile (3)B · 3rd percentile (2)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 5th percentile (1,488 lb)B · 14th percentile (2,300 lb)
Length
median 137 inA · 8th percentile (99.3 in)B · 9th percentile (101 in)
A · CT1025B · 1000Median Utility Tractor