
BobcatModel A
Bobcat CT1025
Utility
- power
- 24.5 hp
- displacement
- 69.1 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
Head to head · Sub-Compact

Utility

How they compare
CT1025 is in the 42nd percentile; 200 is in the 46th · 816 models
CT1025 is in the 33rd percentile; 200 is in the 43rd · 757 models
CT1025 is in the 50th percentile; 200 is in the 11th · 802 models
CT1025 is in the 22nd percentile; 200 is in the 61st · 711 models
Full comparison
| Spec | Bobcat CT1025 | Lanz 200 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Bobcat | Lanz | — |
| Model | CT1025 | 200 | — |
| Category | Utility, Sub-Compact | Sub-Compact | — |
| Spec | Bobcat CT1025 | Lanz 200 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Daedong | John Deere | — |
| Model | Shibaura S733L | Not recorded | — |
| Power Output | 24.5hp | 25hp | ▲ 200+0.5 hp · +2% |
| Rated RPM | 3,000RPM | 2,500RPM | ▲ CT1025+500 RPM · +20% |
| Cylinders | 3 | 2 | ▲ CT1025+1 · +50% |
| Displacement | 69.1ci | 82.4ci | ▲ 200+13.3 ci · +19% |
| Bore | 3in | 3.9in | ▲ 200+0.9 in · +30% |
| Stroke | 3.2in | 3.5in | ▲ 200+0.3 in · +9% |
| Spec | Bobcat CT1025 | Lanz 200 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Hydrostatic | Gear | — |
| Spec | Bobcat CT1025 | Lanz 200 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 99.3in | 123in | ▲ 200+23.7 in · +24% |
| Width | 46in | 60in | ▲ 200+14 in · +30% |
| Height | 87.6in | 56.5in | ▲ CT1025+31.1 in · +55% |
| Operating Weight | 1,488lb | 3,255lb | ▲ 200+1,767 lb · +119% |
| Spec | Bobcat CT1025 | Lanz 200 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | 540/1000 | — |
| Speed 1 | Not recorded | 540rpm | — |
| Speed 2 | Not recorded | 1,000rpm | — |
| Spec | Bobcat CT1025 | Lanz 200 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Rear Type: I | Not recorded | — |
| Spec | Bobcat CT1025 | Lanz 200 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
| Spec | Bobcat CT1025 | Lanz 200 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | Not recorded | 1.7gal | — |
Category context