Head to head · Utility
CaseIH 255 vs CaseIH Farmall DX22E
CaseIHModel B
CaseIH Farmall DX22E
Utility
- power
- 22 hp
- displacement
- 58.2 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
CaseIHCaseIH 255
vs
CaseIHCaseIH Farmall DX22E
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ 255 higher · +2 hp (+9%)25524 hp
Farmall DX22E22 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
255 is in the 14th percentile; Farmall DX22E is in the 11th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 255 higher · +6.6 ci (+11%)25564.8 ci
Farmall DX22E58.2 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
255 is in the 8th percentile; Farmall DX22E is in the 5th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tied2553
Farmall DX22E3
Median Utility Tractor4
255 is in the 23rd percentile; Farmall DX22E is in the 23rd · 5,720 models
Operating Weight
▲ 255 higher · +626 lb (+48%)2551,940 lb
Farmall DX22E1,314 lb
Median Utility Tractor5,303 lb
255 is in the 11th percentile; Farmall DX22E is in the 3rd · 5,107 models
255 (A)Farmall DX22E (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | CaseIH 255 | CaseIH Farmall DX22E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | CaseIH | CaseIH | Same |
| Model | 255 | Farmall DX22E | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility, Sub-Compact | — |
Engine
| Spec | CaseIH 255 | CaseIH Farmall DX22E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Mitsubishi | Shibaura | — |
| Model | Not recorded | ISM-S753 | — |
| Power Output | 24hp | 22hp | ▲ 255+2 hp · +9% |
| Rated RPM | 2,700RPM | 3,000RPM | ▲ Farmall DX22E+300 RPM · +11% |
| Cylinders | 3 | 3 | Same |
| Displacement | 64.8ci | 58.2ci | ▲ 255+6.6 ci · +11% |
| Bore | 3in | 3in | Same |
| Stroke | 3.1in | 2.8in | ▲ 255+0.3 in · +11% |
Transmission
| Spec | CaseIH 255 | CaseIH Farmall DX22E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Constant mesh | Hydrostatic | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | CaseIH 255 | CaseIH Farmall DX22E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 112in | Not recorded | — |
| Width | 47in | Not recorded | — |
| Height | 54.9in | Not recorded | — |
| Operating Weight | 1,940lb | 1,314lb | ▲ 255+626 lb · +48% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | CaseIH 255 | CaseIH Farmall DX22E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Manual | Not recorded | — |
Tires
| Spec | CaseIH 255 | CaseIH Farmall DX22E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rear Tire Size | 9.5-24 | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | CaseIH 255 | CaseIH Farmall DX22E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Category | I | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | CaseIH 255 | CaseIH Farmall DX22E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | — |
| Drive Type | 2WD | 4WD | — |
| Steering Type | Manual | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | CaseIH 255 | CaseIH Farmall DX22E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Capacities
| Spec | CaseIH 255 | CaseIH Farmall DX22E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 1.3gal | Not recorded | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | CaseIH 255 | CaseIH Farmall DX22E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Open | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 14th percentile (24 hp)B · 11th percentile (22 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 8th percentile (64.8 ci)B · 5th percentile (58.2 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 23rd percentile (3)B · 23rd percentile (3)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 11th percentile (1,940 lb)B · 3rd percentile (1,314 lb)
A · 255B · Farmall DX22EMedian Utility Tractor