CaseIHModel A
CaseIH 5250 Maxxum
Utility
- power
- 112 hp
- displacement
- 359 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 16
Head to head · Utility
CaseIH 5250 Maxxum vs CaseIH Puma 115
CaseIHModel B
CaseIH Puma 115
Utility
- power
- 115 hp
- displacement
- 411 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 18
CaseIHCaseIH 5250 Maxxum
vs
CaseIHCaseIH Puma 115
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ Puma 115 higher · +3 hp (+3%)5250 Maxxum112 hp
Puma 115115 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
5250 Maxxum is in the 87th percentile; Puma 115 is in the 88th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ Puma 115 higher · +52 ci (+14%)5250 Maxxum359 ci
Puma 115411 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
5250 Maxxum is in the 87th percentile; Puma 115 is in the 91st · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tied5250 Maxxum6
Puma 1156
Median Utility Tractor4
5250 Maxxum is in the 93rd percentile; Puma 115 is in the 93rd · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
▲ Puma 115 higher · +2 (+13%)5250 Maxxum16
Puma 11518
Median Utility Tractor12
5250 Maxxum is in the 73rd percentile; Puma 115 is in the 83rd · 4,941 models
5250 Maxxum (A)Puma 115 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | CaseIH 5250 Maxxum | CaseIH Puma 115 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | CaseIH | CaseIH | Same |
| Model | 5250 Maxxum | Puma 115 | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | CaseIH 5250 Maxxum | CaseIH Puma 115 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | CDC | CNH | — |
| Power Output | 112hp | 115hp | ▲ Puma 115+3 hp · +3% |
| Rated RPM | 2,200RPM | 2,200RPM | Same |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 | Same |
| Displacement | 359ci | 411ci | ▲ Puma 115+52 ci · +14% |
| Bore | 4in | 4.1in | ▲ Puma 115+0.1 in · +2% |
| Stroke | 4.7in | 5.2in | ▲ Puma 115+0.5 in · +11% |
Transmission
| Spec | CaseIH 5250 Maxxum | CaseIH Puma 115 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Partial power shift | 18-speed partial power shift | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | CaseIH 5250 Maxxum | CaseIH Puma 115 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 171in | Not recorded | — |
| Width | 60in | Not recorded | — |
| Height | 106in | 118in | ▲ Puma 115+12 in · +11% |
| Operating Weight | 9,810lb | 13,230lb | ▲ Puma 115+3,420 lb · +35% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | CaseIH 5250 Maxxum | CaseIH Puma 115 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Closed center | Closed center pressure flow compensated (PFC) | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Hydrostatic Power | — |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | CaseIH 5250 Maxxum | CaseIH Puma 115 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Independent | Not recorded | — |
| Speed 1 | 540rpm | Not recorded | — |
| Speed 2 | 1,000rpm | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | CaseIH 5250 Maxxum | CaseIH Puma 115 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Not recorded | 2/3N | — |
| Hitch Category | II | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Capacity | 7,694lb | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | CaseIH 5250 Maxxum | CaseIH Puma 115 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | — |
| Drive Type | 2WD | 4WD | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Hydrostatic Power | — |
| Brake Type | Not recorded | Hydraulic wet disc | — |
Electrical
| Spec | CaseIH 5250 Maxxum | CaseIH Puma 115 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Operator Station
| Spec | CaseIH 5250 Maxxum | CaseIH Puma 115 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Cab | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 87th percentile (112 hp)B · 88th percentile (115 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 87th percentile (359 ci)B · 91st percentile (411 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 93rd percentile (6)B · 93rd percentile (6)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 73rd percentile (16)B · 83rd percentile (18)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 85th percentile (9,810 lb)B · 92nd percentile (13,230 lb)
A · 5250 MaxxumB · Puma 115Median Utility Tractor