Image not recorded
CaseIHModel A
CaseIH 7230
Row Crop
- power
- 170 hp
- displacement
- 505 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 18
Head to head · Row Crop
CaseIH 7230 vs CaseIH Puma 180
Image not recorded
CaseIHModel B
CaseIH Puma 180
Row Crop
- power
- 180 hp
- displacement
- 411 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 19
CaseIHCaseIH 7230
vs
CaseIHCaseIH Puma 180
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Row Crop
Engine Power
▲ Puma 180 higher · +10 hp (+6%)7230170 hp
Puma 180180 hp
Median Row Crop Tractor138 hp
7230 is in the 67th percentile; Puma 180 is in the 70th · 1,206 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 7230 higher · +94 ci (+23%)7230505 ci
Puma 180411 ci
Median Row Crop Tractor391 ci
7230 is in the 87th percentile; Puma 180 is in the 63rd · 1,409 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tied72306
Puma 1806
Median Row Crop Tractor6
7230 is in the 50th percentile; Puma 180 is in the 50th · 1,417 models
Forward Gears
▲ Puma 180 higher · +1 (+6%)723018
Puma 18019
Median Row Crop Tractor16
7230 is in the 61st percentile; Puma 180 is in the 68th · 1,200 models
7230 (A)Puma 180 (B)Median Row Crop Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | CaseIH 7230 | CaseIH Puma 180 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | CaseIH | CaseIH | Same |
| Model | 7230 | Puma 180 | — |
| Category | Row Crop | Row Crop | Same |
Engine
| Spec | CaseIH 7230 | CaseIH Puma 180 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | CDC | CNH | — |
| Power Output | 170hp | 180hp | ▲ Puma 180+10 hp · +6% |
| Rated RPM | 2,200RPM | 2,200RPM | Same |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 | Same |
| Displacement | 505ci | 411ci | ▲ 7230+94 ci · +23% |
| Bore | 4.5in | 4.1in | ▲ 7230+0.4 in · +10% |
| Stroke | 5.3in | 5.2in | ▲ 7230+0.1 in · +2% |
Transmission
| Spec | CaseIH 7230 | CaseIH Puma 180 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Full power shift with hydraulic wet disc clutch | Full power shift | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | CaseIH 7230 | CaseIH Puma 180 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | Not recorded | 123in | — |
| Operating Weight | 17,790lb | 17,595lb | ▲ 7230+195 lb · +1% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | CaseIH 7230 | CaseIH Puma 180 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Closed center pressure flow compensated (PFC) | Pressure flow compensating (PFC) | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Hydrostatic Power | — |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | CaseIH 7230 | CaseIH Puma 180 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Independent with electro-hydraulic wet disc clutch | Not recorded | — |
| Speed 1 | 1,000rpm | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | CaseIH 7230 | CaseIH Puma 180 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Three-Point Hitch | Rear Type: II/IIIN | — |
| Hitch Category | III/IIIN | II/IIIN | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Rear | Same |
| Hitch Capacity | 10,870lb | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | CaseIH 7230 | CaseIH Puma 180 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | 4x2 2WD | — |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 2WD | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Hydrostatic Power | — |
| Brake Type | Differential hydraulic wet disc | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | CaseIH 7230 | CaseIH Puma 180 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Voltage | Not recorded | 12V | — |
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Capacities
| Spec | CaseIH 7230 | CaseIH Puma 180 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 7.8gal | Not recorded | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | CaseIH 7230 | CaseIH Puma 180 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Cab with air-conditioning | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 138 hpA · 67th percentile (170 hp)B · 70th percentile (180 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 391 ciA · 87th percentile (505 ci)B · 63rd percentile (411 ci)
Cylinders
median 6A · 50th percentile (6)B · 50th percentile (6)
Forward Gears
median 16A · 61st percentile (18)B · 68th percentile (19)
Operating Weight
median 12,307 lbA · 76th percentile (17,790 lb)B · 75th percentile (17,595 lb)
A · 7230B · Puma 180Median Row Crop Tractor