CaseIHModel A
CaseIH 7250
Row Crop
- power
- 215 hp
- displacement
- 505 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 18
Head to head · Row Crop
CaseIH 7250 vs CaseIH Puma 210
Image not recorded
CaseIHModel B
CaseIH Puma 210
Row Crop
- power
- 210 hp
- displacement
- 411 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 18
CaseIHCaseIH 7250
vs
CaseIHCaseIH Puma 210
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Row Crop
Engine Power
▲ 7250 higher · +5 hp (+2%)7250215 hp
Puma 210210 hp
Median Row Crop Tractor138 hp
7250 is in the 80th percentile; Puma 210 is in the 79th · 1,206 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 7250 higher · +94 ci (+23%)7250505 ci
Puma 210411 ci
Median Row Crop Tractor391 ci
7250 is in the 87th percentile; Puma 210 is in the 63rd · 1,409 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tied72506
Puma 2106
Median Row Crop Tractor6
7250 is in the 50th percentile; Puma 210 is in the 50th · 1,417 models
Forward Gears
= Effectively tied725018
Puma 21018
Median Row Crop Tractor16
7250 is in the 61st percentile; Puma 210 is in the 61st · 1,200 models
7250 (A)Puma 210 (B)Median Row Crop Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | CaseIH 7250 | CaseIH Puma 210 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | CaseIH | CaseIH | Same |
| Model | 7250 | Puma 210 | — |
| Category | Row Crop | Row Crop | Same |
Engine
| Spec | CaseIH 7250 | CaseIH Puma 210 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | CDC | CNH | — |
| Power Output | 215hp | 210hp | ▲ 7250+5 hp · +2% |
| Rated RPM | 2,200RPM | 2,200RPM | Same |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 | Same |
| Displacement | 505ci | 411ci | ▲ 7250+94 ci · +23% |
| Bore | 4.5in | 4.1in | ▲ 7250+0.4 in · +10% |
| Stroke | 5.3in | 5.2in | ▲ 7250+0.1 in · +2% |
Transmission
| Spec | CaseIH 7250 | CaseIH Puma 210 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Full power shift and Hydraulic wet disc clutch | Full power shift | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | CaseIH 7250 | CaseIH Puma 210 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | Not recorded | 120in | — |
| Operating Weight | 18,140lb | 17,915lb | ▲ 7250+225 lb · +1% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | CaseIH 7250 | CaseIH Puma 210 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Closed center pressure flow compensated (PFC) | Pressure flow compensating (PFC) | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Hydrostatic power | — |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | CaseIH 7250 | CaseIH Puma 210 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Independent with hydraulic wet disc clutch | Not recorded | — |
| Speed 1 | 1,000rpm | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | CaseIH 7250 | CaseIH Puma 210 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Not recorded | Rear: II/IIIN | — |
| Hitch Category | III | Category 3 | — |
| Hitch Position | Not recorded | Rear | — |
| Hitch Capacity | 14,950lb | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | CaseIH 7250 | CaseIH Puma 210 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | Same |
| Drive Type | Four-wheel drive (4WD) | 4WD | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Hydrostatic power | — |
| Brake Type | Differential hydraulic wet disc | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | CaseIH 7250 | CaseIH Puma 210 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Capacities
| Spec | CaseIH 7250 | CaseIH Puma 210 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 7.8gal | Not recorded | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | CaseIH 7250 | CaseIH Puma 210 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Cab (standard) with air-conditioning | Cab | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 138 hpA · 80th percentile (215 hp)B · 79th percentile (210 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 391 ciA · 87th percentile (505 ci)B · 63rd percentile (411 ci)
Cylinders
median 6A · 50th percentile (6)B · 50th percentile (6)
Forward Gears
median 16A · 61st percentile (18)B · 61st percentile (18)
Operating Weight
median 12,307 lbA · 78th percentile (18,140 lb)B · 78th percentile (17,915 lb)
A · 7250B · Puma 210Median Row Crop Tractor