Head to head · Row Crop

CaseIH Puma 160 vs CaseIH Puma 165

CaseIHCaseIH Puma 160
vs
CaseIHCaseIH Puma 165

How they compare

Headline specs vs. the whole Row Crop

n = 1,2001,417

Engine Power

▲ Puma 165 higher · +5 hp (+3%)
Puma 160160 hp
Puma 165165 hp
Median Row Crop Tractor138 hp

Puma 160 is in the 62nd percentile; Puma 165 is in the 65th · 1,206 models

Engine Displacement

= Effectively tied
Puma 160411 ci
Puma 165411 ci
Median Row Crop Tractor391 ci

Puma 160 is in the 60th percentile; Puma 165 is in the 63rd · 1,409 models

Cylinders

= Effectively tied
Puma 1606
Puma 1656
Median Row Crop Tractor6

Puma 160 is in the 50th percentile; Puma 165 is in the 50th · 1,417 models

Forward Gears

= Effectively tied
Puma 16018
Puma 16518
Median Row Crop Tractor16

Puma 160 is in the 61st percentile; Puma 165 is in the 61st · 1,200 models

Puma 160 (A)Puma 165 (B)Median Row Crop Tractor

Full comparison

Every spec, side by side

General Information

SpecCaseIH Puma 160CaseIH Puma 165Difference
ManufacturerCaseIHCaseIHSame
ModelPuma 160Puma 165
CategoryRow CropRow CropSame

Engine

SpecCaseIH Puma 160CaseIH Puma 165Difference
ManufacturerFPTCNH / FPT
Power Output160hp165hpPuma 165+5 hp · +3%
Rated RPM2,200RPM2,200RPMSame
Cylinders66Same
Displacement411ci411ciSame
Bore4.1in4.1inSame
Stroke5.2in5.2inSame

Transmission

SpecCaseIH Puma 160CaseIH Puma 165Difference
TypeFull power shiftFull power shiftSame

Dimensions & Weight

SpecCaseIH Puma 160CaseIH Puma 165Difference
Width61.4inNot recorded
HeightNot recorded120in
Operating Weight16,360lb17,725lbPuma 165+1,365 lb · +8%

Hydraulics

SpecCaseIH Puma 160CaseIH Puma 165Difference
System TypeClosed center pressure flow compensating (PFC)Closed center pressure flow compensating
Steering TypeNot recordedHydrostatic Power

Tires

SpecCaseIH Puma 160CaseIH Puma 165Difference
Front Tire SizeNot recorded16.9-30
Rear Tire SizeNot recorded20.8-42

Hitch & Towing

SpecCaseIH Puma 160CaseIH Puma 165Difference
Hitch Category2/3NII/IIIN
Hitch PositionNot recordedRear

Chassis & Drive

SpecCaseIH Puma 160CaseIH Puma 165Difference
Chassis Type4x4 MFWD 4WD4x4 MFWD 4WDSame
Drive Type4WD4WDSame
Steering TypeNot recordedHydrostatic Power

Electrical

SpecCaseIH Puma 160CaseIH Puma 165Difference
Starter TypeElectricElectricSame

Emissions

SpecCaseIH Puma 160CaseIH Puma 165Difference
StandardInterim Tier 4Not recorded
Control Systemselective catalytic reduction (SCR)Not recorded

Category context

Both models against the field

Engine Power

median 138 hp
A · 62nd percentile (160 hp)B · 65th percentile (165 hp)

Engine Displacement

median 391 ci
A · 60th percentile (411 ci)B · 63rd percentile (411 ci)

Cylinders

median 6
A · 50th percentile (6)B · 50th percentile (6)

Forward Gears

median 16
A · 61st percentile (18)B · 61st percentile (18)

Operating Weight

median 12,307 lb
A · 71st percentile (16,360 lb)B · 76th percentile (17,725 lb)
A · Puma 160B · Puma 165Median Row Crop Tractor
Full spec pageCaseIH Puma 160Full spec pageCaseIH Puma 165