CaseIHModel A
CaseIH Puma 170
Row Crop
- power
- 167 hp
- displacement
- 411 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 18
Head to head · Row Crop
CaseIH Puma 170 vs Fendt 916 Vario
Image not recorded
FendtModel B
Fendt 916 Vario
Row Crop
- power
- 180 hp
- displacement
- 419 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
CaseIHCaseIH Puma 170
vs
FendtFendt 916 Vario
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Row Crop
Engine Power
▲ 916 Vario higher · +13 hp (+8%)Puma 170167 hp
916 Vario180 hp
Median Row Crop Tractor138 hp
Puma 170 is in the 66th percentile; 916 Vario is in the 70th · 1,206 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 916 Vario higher · +8 ci (+2%)Puma 170411 ci
916 Vario419 ci
Median Row Crop Tractor391 ci
Puma 170 is in the 60th percentile; 916 Vario is in the 71st · 1,409 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedPuma 1706
916 Vario6
Median Row Crop Tractor6
Puma 170 is in the 50th percentile; 916 Vario is in the 50th · 1,417 models
Operating Weight
▲ 916 Vario higher · +550 lb (+3%)Puma 17018,740 lb
916 Vario19,290 lb
Median Row Crop Tractor12,307 lb
Puma 170 is in the 81st percentile; 916 Vario is in the 82nd · 1,350 models
Puma 170 (A)916 Vario (B)Median Row Crop Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 170 | Fendt 916 Vario | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | CaseIH | Fendt | — |
| Model | Puma 170 | 916 Vario | — |
| Category | Row Crop | Row Crop | Same |
Engine
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 170 | Fendt 916 Vario | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | FPT | MAN | — |
| Model | Not recorded | D0836 | — |
| Power Output | 167hp | 180hp | ▲ 916 Vario+13 hp · +8% |
| Rated RPM | 2,200RPM | 2,150RPM | ▲ Puma 170+50 RPM · +2% |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 | Same |
| Displacement | 411ci | 419ci | ▲ 916 Vario+8 ci · +2% |
| Bore | 4.1in | 4.3in | ▲ 916 Vario+0.2 in · +5% |
| Stroke | 5.2in | 4.9in | ▲ Puma 170+0.3 in · +6% |
Transmission
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 170 | Fendt 916 Vario | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Full power shift | Continuously-variable transmission | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 170 | Fendt 916 Vario | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | Not recorded | 195in | — |
| Width | Not recorded | 100in | — |
| Height | Not recorded | 122in | — |
| Operating Weight | 18,740lb | 19,290lb | ▲ 916 Vario+550 lb · +3% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 170 | Fendt 916 Vario | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Closed Center Pressure Flow Compensating (PFC) | Load sensing | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic Power | Power | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 170 | Fendt 916 Vario | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | 2/3N | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 170 | Fendt 916 Vario | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | Same |
| Drive Type | 4 Wheel Drive (4WD) | 4WD | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic Power | Power | — |
Electrical
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 170 | Fendt 916 Vario | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Emissions
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 170 | Fendt 916 Vario | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Control System | SCR | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 138 hpA · 66th percentile (167 hp)B · 70th percentile (180 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 391 ciA · 60th percentile (411 ci)B · 71st percentile (419 ci)
Cylinders
median 6A · 50th percentile (6)B · 50th percentile (6)
Operating Weight
median 12,307 lbA · 81st percentile (18,740 lb)B · 82nd percentile (19,290 lb)
A · Puma 170B · 916 VarioMedian Row Crop Tractor