Image not recorded
CaseIHModel A
CaseIH Puma 180
Row Crop
- power
- 180 hp
- displacement
- 411 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 19
Head to head · Row Crop
CaseIH Puma 180 vs Fendt Favorit 916 Vario
Image not recorded
FendtModel B
Fendt Favorit 916 Vario
Row Crop
- power
- 170 hp
- displacement
- 419 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
CaseIHCaseIH Puma 180
vs
FendtFendt Favorit 916 Vario
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Row Crop
Engine Power
▲ Puma 180 higher · +10 hp (+6%)Puma 180180 hp
Favorit 916 Vario170 hp
Median Row Crop Tractor138 hp
Puma 180 is in the 70th percentile; Favorit 916 Vario is in the 67th · 1,206 models
Engine Displacement
▲ Favorit 916 Vario higher · +8 ci (+2%)Puma 180411 ci
Favorit 916 Vario419 ci
Median Row Crop Tractor391 ci
Puma 180 is in the 63rd percentile; Favorit 916 Vario is in the 71st · 1,409 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedPuma 1806
Favorit 916 Vario6
Median Row Crop Tractor6
Puma 180 is in the 50th percentile; Favorit 916 Vario is in the 50th · 1,417 models
Operating Weight
▲ Favorit 916 Vario higher · +67 lb (<1%)Puma 18017,595 lb
Favorit 916 Vario17,662 lb
Median Row Crop Tractor12,307 lb
Puma 180 is in the 75th percentile; Favorit 916 Vario is in the 76th · 1,350 models
Puma 180 (A)Favorit 916 Vario (B)Median Row Crop Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 180 | Fendt Favorit 916 Vario | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | CaseIH | Fendt | — |
| Model | Puma 180 | Favorit 916 Vario | — |
| Category | Row Crop | Row Crop | Same |
Engine
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 180 | Fendt Favorit 916 Vario | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | CNH | MAN | — |
| Power Output | 180hp | 170hp | ▲ Puma 180+10 hp · +6% |
| Rated RPM | 2,200RPM | 2,200RPM | Same |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 | Same |
| Displacement | 411ci | 419ci | ▲ Favorit 916 Vario+8 ci · +2% |
| Bore | 4.1in | 4.3in | ▲ Favorit 916 Vario+0.2 in · +5% |
| Stroke | 5.2in | 4.9in | ▲ Puma 180+0.3 in · +6% |
Transmission
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 180 | Fendt Favorit 916 Vario | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Full power shift | Continuously Variable Transmission (CVT) | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 180 | Fendt Favorit 916 Vario | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | Not recorded | 194in | — |
| Height | 123in | 122in | ▲ Puma 180+1 in · <1% |
| Operating Weight | 17,595lb | 17,662lb | ▲ Favorit 916 Vario+67 lb · <1% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 180 | Fendt Favorit 916 Vario | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Pressure flow compensating (PFC) | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic Power | Power | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 180 | Fendt Favorit 916 Vario | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Rear Type: II/IIIN | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Category | II/IIIN | Category 3 | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 180 | Fendt Favorit 916 Vario | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | — |
| Drive Type | 2WD | MFWD / 4WD | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic Power | Power | — |
Electrical
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 180 | Fendt Favorit 916 Vario | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Voltage | 12V | Not recorded | — |
| Starter Type | Electric | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 138 hpA · 70th percentile (180 hp)B · 67th percentile (170 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 391 ciA · 63rd percentile (411 ci)B · 71st percentile (419 ci)
Cylinders
median 6A · 50th percentile (6)B · 50th percentile (6)
Operating Weight
median 12,307 lbA · 75th percentile (17,595 lb)B · 76th percentile (17,662 lb)
Height
median 114 inA · 80th percentile (123 in)B · 78th percentile (122 in)
A · Puma 180B · Favorit 916 VarioMedian Row Crop Tractor