Image not recorded
CaseIHModel A
CaseIH Puma 180
Row Crop
- power
- 180 hp
- displacement
- 411 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 19
Head to head · Row Crop
CaseIH Puma 180 vs Massey Ferguson 8250
Massey FergusonModel B
Massey Ferguson 8250
Row Crop
- power
- 183 hp
- displacement
- 449 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 32
CaseIHCaseIH Puma 180
vs
Massey FergusonMassey Ferguson 8250
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Row Crop
Engine Power
▲ 8250 higher · +3 hp (+2%)Puma 180180 hp
8250183 hp
Median Row Crop Tractor138 hp
Puma 180 is in the 70th percentile; 8250 is in the 71st · 1,206 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 8250 higher · +38 ci (+9%)Puma 180411 ci
8250449 ci
Median Row Crop Tractor391 ci
Puma 180 is in the 63rd percentile; 8250 is in the 77th · 1,409 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedPuma 1806
82506
Median Row Crop Tractor6
Puma 180 is in the 50th percentile; 8250 is in the 50th · 1,417 models
Forward Gears
▲ 8250 higher · +13 (+68%)Puma 18019
825032
Median Row Crop Tractor16
Puma 180 is in the 68th percentile; 8250 is in the 91st · 1,200 models
Puma 180 (A)8250 (B)Median Row Crop Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 180 | Massey Ferguson 8250 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | CaseIH | Massey Ferguson | — |
| Model | Puma 180 | 8250 | — |
| Category | Row Crop | Row Crop | Same |
Engine
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 180 | Massey Ferguson 8250 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | CNH | Valmet | — |
| Power Output | 180hp | 183hp | ▲ 8250+3 hp · +2% |
| Rated RPM | 2,200RPM | 2,200RPM | Same |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 | Same |
| Displacement | 411ci | 449ci | ▲ 8250+38 ci · +9% |
| Bore | 4.1in | 4.3in | ▲ 8250+0.2 in · +5% |
| Stroke | 5.2in | 5.3in | ▲ 8250+0.1 in · +2% |
Transmission
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 180 | Massey Ferguson 8250 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Full power shift | four-range power shift | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 180 | Massey Ferguson 8250 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 123in | Not recorded | — |
| Operating Weight | 17,595lb | 18,065lb | ▲ 8250+470 lb · +3% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 180 | Massey Ferguson 8250 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Pressure flow compensating (PFC) | pressure flow compensated (PFC) | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic Power | hydrostatic power | Same |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 180 | Massey Ferguson 8250 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Rear Type: II/IIIN | Category 3 | — |
| Hitch Category | II/IIIN | III | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Rear | Same |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 180 | Massey Ferguson 8250 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | — |
| Drive Type | 2WD | 4WD | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic Power | hydrostatic power | Same |
Electrical
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 180 | Massey Ferguson 8250 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Voltage | 12V | Not recorded | — |
| Starter Type | Electric | Not recorded | — |
Capacities
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 180 | Massey Ferguson 8250 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | Not recorded | 7.8gal | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 138 hpA · 70th percentile (180 hp)B · 71st percentile (183 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 391 ciA · 63rd percentile (411 ci)B · 77th percentile (449 ci)
Cylinders
median 6A · 50th percentile (6)B · 50th percentile (6)
Forward Gears
median 16A · 68th percentile (19)B · 91st percentile (32)
Operating Weight
median 12,307 lbA · 75th percentile (17,595 lb)B · 78th percentile (18,065 lb)
A · Puma 180B · 8250Median Row Crop Tractor