Head to head · Row Crop

CaseIH Puma 200 vs Claas Axion 800

Image not recorded
CaseIHModel A

CaseIH Puma 200

Row Crop

power
200 hp
displacement
411 ci
Cylinders
6
Forward gears
18
Full Puma 200 specs
Image not recorded
ClaasModel B

Claas Axion 800

Row Crop

power
193 hp
displacement
411 ci
Cylinders
6
Forward gears
24
Full Axion 800 specs
CaseIHCaseIH Puma 200
vs
ClaasClaas Axion 800

How they compare

Headline specs vs. the whole Row Crop

n = 1,2001,417

Engine Power

▲ Puma 200 higher · +7 hp (+4%)
Puma 200200 hp
Axion 800193 hp
Median Row Crop Tractor138 hp

Puma 200 is in the 77th percentile; Axion 800 is in the 74th · 1,206 models

Engine Displacement

= Effectively tied
Puma 200411 ci
Axion 800411 ci
Median Row Crop Tractor391 ci

Puma 200 is in the 60th percentile; Axion 800 is in the 60th · 1,409 models

Cylinders

= Effectively tied
Puma 2006
Axion 8006
Median Row Crop Tractor6

Puma 200 is in the 50th percentile; Axion 800 is in the 50th · 1,417 models

Forward Gears

▲ Axion 800 higher · +6 (+33%)
Puma 20018
Axion 80024
Median Row Crop Tractor16

Puma 200 is in the 61st percentile; Axion 800 is in the 81st · 1,200 models

Puma 200 (A)Axion 800 (B)Median Row Crop Tractor

Full comparison

Every spec, side by side

General Information

SpecCaseIH Puma 200Claas Axion 800Difference
ManufacturerCaseIHClaas
ModelPuma 200Axion 800
CategoryRow CropRow CropSame

Engine

SpecCaseIH Puma 200Claas Axion 800Difference
ManufacturerFPTFPTSame
Power Output200hp193hpPuma 200+7 hp · +4%
Rated RPM2,200RPM2,150RPMPuma 200+50 RPM · +2%
Cylinders66Same
Displacement411ci411ciSame
Bore4.1in4.1inSame
Stroke5.2in5.2inSame

Transmission

SpecCaseIH Puma 200Claas Axion 800Difference
TypeFull power shift24-speed power shift

Dimensions & Weight

SpecCaseIH Puma 200Claas Axion 800Difference
LengthNot recorded214in
Width60inNot recorded
HeightNot recorded127in
Operating Weight18,940lb18,298lbPuma 200+642 lb · +4%

Hydraulics

SpecCaseIH Puma 200Claas Axion 800Difference
System TypeClosed center pressure flow compensating (PFC)Load sensing
Steering TypeHydrostatic powerPower

Hitch & Towing

SpecCaseIH Puma 200Claas Axion 800Difference
Hitch Type2/3NNot recorded
Hitch PositionRearNot recorded

Chassis & Drive

SpecCaseIH Puma 200Claas Axion 800Difference
Chassis Type4x4 MFWD 4WD4x4 MFWD 4WDSame
Drive Type4WD4WDSame
Steering TypeHydrostatic powerPower

Electrical

SpecCaseIH Puma 200Claas Axion 800Difference
Starter TypeElectricElectricSame

Emissions

SpecCaseIH Puma 200Claas Axion 800Difference
StandardInterim Tier 4Not recorded
Control SystemSelective catalytic reduction (SCR)Not recorded

Operator Station

SpecCaseIH Puma 200Claas Axion 800Difference
TypeNot recordedCab

Category context

Both models against the field

Engine Power

median 138 hp
A · 77th percentile (200 hp)B · 74th percentile (193 hp)

Engine Displacement

median 391 ci
A · 60th percentile (411 ci)B · 60th percentile (411 ci)

Cylinders

median 6
A · 50th percentile (6)B · 50th percentile (6)

Forward Gears

median 16
A · 61st percentile (18)B · 81st percentile (24)

Operating Weight

median 12,307 lb
A · 81st percentile (18,940 lb)B · 79th percentile (18,298 lb)
A · Puma 200B · Axion 800Median Row Crop Tractor
Full spec pageCaseIH Puma 200Full spec pageClaas Axion 800