Image not recorded
CaseIHModel A
CaseIH Puma 200
Row Crop
- power
- 200 hp
- displacement
- 411 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 18
Head to head · Row Crop
CaseIH Puma 200 vs John Deere 7815
John DeereModel B
John Deere 7815
Row Crop
- power
- 202 hp
- displacement
- 414 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 16
CaseIHCaseIH Puma 200
vs
John DeereJohn Deere 7815
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Row Crop
Engine Power
▲ 7815 higher · +2 hp (+1%)Puma 200200 hp
7815202 hp
Median Row Crop Tractor138 hp
Puma 200 is in the 77th percentile; 7815 is in the 77th · 1,206 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 7815 higher · +3 ci (<1%)Puma 200411 ci
7815414 ci
Median Row Crop Tractor391 ci
Puma 200 is in the 60th percentile; 7815 is in the 66th · 1,409 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedPuma 2006
78156
Median Row Crop Tractor6
Puma 200 is in the 50th percentile; 7815 is in the 50th · 1,417 models
Forward Gears
▲ Puma 200 higher · +2 (+13%)Puma 20018
781516
Median Row Crop Tractor16
Puma 200 is in the 61st percentile; 7815 is in the 50th · 1,200 models
Puma 200 (A)7815 (B)Median Row Crop Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 200 | John Deere 7815 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | CaseIH | John Deere | — |
| Model | Puma 200 | 7815 | — |
| Category | Row Crop | Row Crop | Same |
Engine
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 200 | John Deere 7815 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | FPT | John Deere | — |
| Power Output | 200hp | 202hp | ▲ 7815+2 hp · +1% |
| Rated RPM | 2,200RPM | 2,100RPM | ▲ Puma 200+100 RPM · +5% |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 | Same |
| Displacement | 411ci | 414ci | ▲ 7815+3 ci · <1% |
| Bore | 4.1in | 4.2in | ▲ 7815+0.1 in · +2% |
| Stroke | 5.2in | 5in | ▲ Puma 200+0.2 in · +4% |
Transmission
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 200 | John Deere 7815 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Full power shift | Partial power shift | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 200 | John Deere 7815 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | Not recorded | 212in | — |
| Width | 60in | 96in | ▲ 7815+36 in · +60% |
| Height | Not recorded | 123in | — |
| Operating Weight | 18,940lb | 17,860lb | ▲ Puma 200+1,080 lb · +6% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 200 | John Deere 7815 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Closed center pressure flow compensating (PFC) | Closed center load sensing | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Hydrostatic power | Same |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 200 | John Deere 7815 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | 2/3N | 3/3N | — |
| Hitch Category | Not recorded | Category 3 | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 200 | John Deere 7815 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | Same |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD | Same |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Hydrostatic power | Same |
Electrical
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 200 | John Deere 7815 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Not recorded | — |
Emissions
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 200 | John Deere 7815 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Standard | Interim Tier 4 | Not recorded | — |
| Control System | Selective catalytic reduction (SCR) | Not recorded | — |
Capacities
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 200 | John Deere 7815 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | Not recorded | 7.7gal | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 200 | John Deere 7815 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | Cab | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 138 hpA · 77th percentile (200 hp)B · 77th percentile (202 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 391 ciA · 60th percentile (411 ci)B · 66th percentile (414 ci)
Cylinders
median 6A · 50th percentile (6)B · 50th percentile (6)
Forward Gears
median 16A · 61st percentile (18)B · 50th percentile (16)
Operating Weight
median 12,307 lbA · 81st percentile (18,940 lb)B · 77th percentile (17,860 lb)
A · Puma 200B · 7815Median Row Crop Tractor