Head to head · Row Crop

CaseIH Puma 200 vs John Deere 6195R

Image not recorded
CaseIHModel A

CaseIH Puma 200

Row Crop

power
200 hp
displacement
411 ci
Cylinders
6
Forward gears
18
Full Puma 200 specs
John Deere 6195R Tractor
John DeereModel B

John Deere 6195R

Row Crop

power
195 hp
displacement
415 ci
Cylinders
6
Forward gears
Not recorded
Full 6195R specs
CaseIHCaseIH Puma 200
vs
John DeereJohn Deere 6195R

How they compare

Headline specs vs. the whole Row Crop

n = 8061,417

Engine Power

▲ Puma 200 higher · +5 hp (+3%)
Puma 200200 hp
6195R195 hp
Median Row Crop Tractor138 hp

Puma 200 is in the 77th percentile; 6195R is in the 75th · 1,206 models

Engine Displacement

▲ 6195R higher · +4 ci (<1%)
Puma 200411 ci
6195R415 ci
Median Row Crop Tractor391 ci

Puma 200 is in the 60th percentile; 6195R is in the 69th · 1,409 models

Cylinders

= Effectively tied
Puma 2006
6195R6
Median Row Crop Tractor6

Puma 200 is in the 50th percentile; 6195R is in the 50th · 1,417 models

Operating Weight

▲ 6195R higher · +670 lb (+4%)
Puma 20018,940 lb
6195R19,610 lb
Median Row Crop Tractor12,307 lb

Puma 200 is in the 81st percentile; 6195R is in the 83rd · 1,350 models

Puma 200 (A)6195R (B)Median Row Crop Tractor

Full comparison

Every spec, side by side

General Information

SpecCaseIH Puma 200John Deere 6195RDifference
ManufacturerCaseIHJohn Deere
ModelPuma 2006195R
CategoryRow CropRow CropSame

Engine

SpecCaseIH Puma 200John Deere 6195RDifference
ManufacturerFPTJohn Deere
ModelNot recordedJohn Deere PowerTech PVS
Power Output200hp195hpPuma 200+5 hp · +3%
Rated RPM2,200RPM2,100RPMPuma 200+100 RPM · +5%
Cylinders66Same
Displacement411ci415ci6195R+4 ci · <1%
Bore4.1in4.2in6195R+0.1 in · +2%
Stroke5.2in5inPuma 200+0.2 in · +4%

Transmission

SpecCaseIH Puma 200John Deere 6195RDifference
TypeFull power shiftPartial power shift

Dimensions & Weight

SpecCaseIH Puma 200John Deere 6195RDifference
LengthNot recorded199in
Width60in100in6195R+40 in · +67%
HeightNot recorded126in
Operating Weight18,940lb19,610lb6195R+670 lb · +4%

Hydraulics

SpecCaseIH Puma 200John Deere 6195RDifference
System TypeClosed center pressure flow compensating (PFC)Closed center pressure flow compensated (PFC)
Steering TypeHydrostatic powerPower

Hitch & Towing

SpecCaseIH Puma 200John Deere 6195RDifference
Hitch Type2/3NThree-Point Hitch
Hitch CategoryNot recordedIII
Hitch PositionRearNot recorded

Chassis & Drive

SpecCaseIH Puma 200John Deere 6195RDifference
Chassis Type4x4 MFWD 4WD4x4 MFWD 4WDSame
Drive Type4WD4WDSame
Steering TypeHydrostatic powerPower

Electrical

SpecCaseIH Puma 200John Deere 6195RDifference
Starter TypeElectricElectricSame

Emissions

SpecCaseIH Puma 200John Deere 6195RDifference
StandardInterim Tier 4Not recorded
Control SystemSelective catalytic reduction (SCR)Not recorded

Capacities

SpecCaseIH Puma 200John Deere 6195RDifference
CoolantNot recorded7.4gal

Operator Station

SpecCaseIH Puma 200John Deere 6195RDifference
TypeNot recordedCab

Category context

Both models against the field

Engine Power

median 138 hp
A · 77th percentile (200 hp)B · 75th percentile (195 hp)

Engine Displacement

median 391 ci
A · 60th percentile (411 ci)B · 69th percentile (415 ci)

Cylinders

median 6
A · 50th percentile (6)B · 50th percentile (6)

Operating Weight

median 12,307 lb
A · 81st percentile (18,940 lb)B · 83rd percentile (19,610 lb)

Width

median 91.2 in
A · 2nd percentile (60 in)B · 86th percentile (100 in)
A · Puma 200B · 6195RMedian Row Crop Tractor
Full spec pageCaseIH Puma 200Full spec pageJohn Deere 6195R