Image not recorded
CaseIHModel A
CaseIH Puma 200
Row Crop
- power
- 200 hp
- displacement
- 411 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 18
Head to head · Row Crop
CaseIH Puma 200 vs Deutz-Fahr 7210 TTV
Deutz-FahrModel B
Deutz-Fahr 7210 TTV
Row Crop
- power
- 205 hp
- displacement
- 370 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
CaseIHCaseIH Puma 200
vs
Deutz-FahrDeutz-Fahr 7210 TTV
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Row Crop
Engine Power
▲ 7210 TTV higher · +5 hp (+3%)Puma 200200 hp
7210 TTV205 hp
Median Row Crop Tractor138 hp
Puma 200 is in the 77th percentile; 7210 TTV is in the 78th · 1,206 models
Engine Displacement
▲ Puma 200 higher · +41 ci (+11%)Puma 200411 ci
7210 TTV370 ci
Median Row Crop Tractor391 ci
Puma 200 is in the 60th percentile; 7210 TTV is in the 46th · 1,409 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedPuma 2006
7210 TTV6
Median Row Crop Tractor6
Puma 200 is in the 50th percentile; 7210 TTV is in the 50th · 1,417 models
Operating Weight
▲ Puma 200 higher · +24 lb (<1%)Puma 20018,940 lb
7210 TTV18,916 lb
Median Row Crop Tractor12,307 lb
Puma 200 is in the 81st percentile; 7210 TTV is in the 81st · 1,350 models
Puma 200 (A)7210 TTV (B)Median Row Crop Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 200 | Deutz-Fahr 7210 TTV | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | CaseIH | Deutz-Fahr | — |
| Model | Puma 200 | 7210 TTV | — |
| Category | Row Crop | Row Crop | Same |
Engine
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 200 | Deutz-Fahr 7210 TTV | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | FPT | Deutz-Fahr | — |
| Model | Not recorded | TCD 6.1 L06 4V | — |
| Power Output | 200hp | 205hp | ▲ 7210 TTV+5 hp · +3% |
| Rated RPM | 2,200RPM | 2,100RPM | ▲ Puma 200+100 RPM · +5% |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 | Same |
| Displacement | 411ci | 370ci | ▲ Puma 200+41 ci · +11% |
| Bore | 4.1in | 4in | ▲ Puma 200+0.1 in · +2% |
| Stroke | 5.2in | 5in | ▲ Puma 200+0.2 in · +4% |
Transmission
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 200 | Deutz-Fahr 7210 TTV | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Full power shift | Not recorded | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 200 | Deutz-Fahr 7210 TTV | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | Not recorded | 196in | — |
| Width | 60in | 98.4in | ▲ 7210 TTV+38.4 in · +64% |
| Height | Not recorded | 124in | — |
| Operating Weight | 18,940lb | 18,916lb | ▲ Puma 200+24 lb · <1% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 200 | Deutz-Fahr 7210 TTV | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Closed center pressure flow compensating (PFC) | Load Sensing | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Power | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 200 | Deutz-Fahr 7210 TTV | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | 2/3N | Type III/II | — |
| Hitch Category | Not recorded | III/II | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Rear | Same |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 200 | Deutz-Fahr 7210 TTV | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | Same |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD | Same |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Power | — |
Electrical
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 200 | Deutz-Fahr 7210 TTV | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Emissions
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 200 | Deutz-Fahr 7210 TTV | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Standard | Interim Tier 4 | Not recorded | — |
| Control System | Selective catalytic reduction (SCR) | Not recorded | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 200 | Deutz-Fahr 7210 TTV | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | Cab | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 138 hpA · 77th percentile (200 hp)B · 78th percentile (205 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 391 ciA · 60th percentile (411 ci)B · 46th percentile (370 ci)
Cylinders
median 6A · 50th percentile (6)B · 50th percentile (6)
Operating Weight
median 12,307 lbA · 81st percentile (18,940 lb)B · 81st percentile (18,916 lb)
Width
median 91.2 inA · 2nd percentile (60 in)B · 80th percentile (98.4 in)
A · Puma 200B · 7210 TTVMedian Row Crop Tractor