Image not recorded
CaseIHModel A
CaseIH Puma 240
Row Crop
- power
- 240 hp
- displacement
- 411 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 18
Head to head · Row Crop
CaseIH Puma 240 vs Caterpillar AG6
Image not recorded
CaterpillarModel B
Caterpillar AG6
Agricultural
- power
- 240 hp
- displacement
- 638 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 6
CaseIHCaseIH Puma 240
vs
CaterpillarCaterpillar AG6
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Row Crop
Engine Power
= Effectively tiedPuma 240240 hp
AG6240 hp
Median Row Crop Tractor138 hp
Puma 240 is in the 86th percentile; AG6 is in the 86th · 1,206 models
Engine Displacement
▲ AG6 higher · +227 ci (+55%)Puma 240411 ci
AG6638 ci
Median Row Crop Tractor391 ci
Puma 240 is in the 60th percentile; AG6 is in the 98th · 1,409 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedPuma 2406
AG66
Median Row Crop Tractor6
Puma 240 is in the 50th percentile; AG6 is in the 50th · 1,417 models
Forward Gears
▲ Puma 240 higher · +12 (+200%)Puma 24018
AG66
Median Row Crop Tractor16
Puma 240 is in the 61st percentile; AG6 is in the 11th · 1,200 models
Puma 240 (A)AG6 (B)Median Row Crop Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 240 | Caterpillar AG6 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | CaseIH | Caterpillar | — |
| Model | Puma 240 | AG6 | — |
| Category | Row Crop | Agricultural | — |
Engine
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 240 | Caterpillar AG6 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | FPT | Caterpillar | — |
| Model | Not recorded | 3306 | — |
| Power Output | 240hp | 240hp | Same |
| Rated RPM | 2,200RPM | 2,200RPM | Same |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 | Same |
| Displacement | 411ci | 638ci | ▲ AG6+227 ci · +55% |
| Bore | 4.1in | 4.8in | ▲ AG6+0.7 in · +17% |
| Stroke | 5.2in | 6in | ▲ AG6+0.8 in · +15% |
Transmission
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 240 | Caterpillar AG6 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Full power shift | Sliding Gear | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 240 | Caterpillar AG6 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | Not recorded | 202in | — |
| Width | Not recorded | 98in | — |
| Operating Weight | 16,800lb | 32,600lb | ▲ AG6+15,800 lb · +94% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 240 | Caterpillar AG6 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open center pressure flow compensating | Closed Center Load Sensing | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Hydraulic Wet Disc Clutches | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 240 | Caterpillar AG6 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Three-Point Hitch | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Category | 3 | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 240 | Caterpillar AG6 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | Not recorded | — |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Hydraulic Wet Disc Clutches | — |
Electrical
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 240 | Caterpillar AG6 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Emissions
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 240 | Caterpillar AG6 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Control System | Selective catalytic reduction (SCR) | Not recorded | — |
Capacities
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 240 | Caterpillar AG6 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | Not recorded | 12gal | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 240 | Caterpillar AG6 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | Cab | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 138 hpA · 86th percentile (240 hp)B · 86th percentile (240 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 391 ciA · 60th percentile (411 ci)B · 98th percentile (638 ci)
Cylinders
median 6A · 50th percentile (6)B · 50th percentile (6)
Forward Gears
median 16A · 61st percentile (18)B · 11th percentile (6)
Operating Weight
median 12,307 lbA · 73rd percentile (16,800 lb)B · 99th percentile (32,600 lb)
A · Puma 240B · AG6Median Row Crop Tractor