Image not recorded
CaseIHModel A
CaseIH Puma 240
Row Crop
- power
- 240 hp
- displacement
- 411 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 18
Head to head · Row Crop
CaseIH Puma 240 vs Challenger 45
Image not recorded
ChallengerModel B
Challenger 45
Industrial
- power
- 240 hp
- displacement
- 403 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 16
CaseIHCaseIH Puma 240
vs
ChallengerChallenger 45
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Row Crop
Engine Power
= Effectively tiedPuma 240240 hp
45240 hp
Median Row Crop Tractor138 hp
Puma 240 is in the 86th percentile; 45 is in the 86th · 1,206 models
Engine Displacement
▲ Puma 240 higher · +8 ci (+2%)Puma 240411 ci
45403 ci
Median Row Crop Tractor391 ci
Puma 240 is in the 60th percentile; 45 is in the 56th · 1,409 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedPuma 2406
456
Median Row Crop Tractor6
Puma 240 is in the 50th percentile; 45 is in the 50th · 1,417 models
Forward Gears
▲ Puma 240 higher · +2 (+13%)Puma 24018
4516
Median Row Crop Tractor16
Puma 240 is in the 61st percentile; 45 is in the 50th · 1,200 models
Puma 240 (A)45 (B)Median Row Crop Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 240 | Challenger 45 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | CaseIH | Challenger | — |
| Model | Puma 240 | 45 | — |
| Category | Row Crop | Industrial | — |
Engine
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 240 | Challenger 45 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | FPT | Caterpillar | — |
| Model | Not recorded | 3116 | — |
| Power Output | 240hp | 240hp | Same |
| Rated RPM | 2,200RPM | 2,100RPM | ▲ Puma 240+100 RPM · +5% |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 | Same |
| Displacement | 411ci | 403ci | ▲ Puma 240+8 ci · +2% |
| Bore | 4.1in | 4.1in | Same |
| Stroke | 5.2in | 5in | ▲ Puma 240+0.2 in · +4% |
Transmission
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 240 | Challenger 45 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Full power shift | Full Power Shift | Same |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 240 | Challenger 45 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | Not recorded | 211in | — |
| Width | Not recorded | 91in | — |
| Height | Not recorded | 120in | — |
| Operating Weight | 16,800lb | 22,700lb | ▲ 45+5,900 lb · +35% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 240 | Challenger 45 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open center pressure flow compensating | Variable-displacement Load-sensing Pressure-compensated | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Differential Power | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 240 | Challenger 45 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Three-Point Hitch | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Category | 3 | III/II | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Rear | Same |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 240 | Challenger 45 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | Not recorded | — |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Differential Power | — |
Electrical
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 240 | Challenger 45 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | 12-volts | — |
Emissions
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 240 | Challenger 45 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Control System | Selective catalytic reduction (SCR) | Not recorded | — |
Capacities
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 240 | Challenger 45 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | Not recorded | 8.6gal | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 138 hpA · 86th percentile (240 hp)B · 86th percentile (240 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 391 ciA · 60th percentile (411 ci)B · 56th percentile (403 ci)
Cylinders
median 6A · 50th percentile (6)B · 50th percentile (6)
Forward Gears
median 16A · 61st percentile (18)B · 50th percentile (16)
Operating Weight
median 12,307 lbA · 73rd percentile (16,800 lb)B · 90th percentile (22,700 lb)
A · Puma 240B · 45Median Row Crop Tractor