Head to head · Row Crop

CaseIH Puma 240 vs Challenger MT595E

Image not recorded
CaseIHModel A

CaseIH Puma 240

Row Crop

power
240 hp
displacement
411 ci
Cylinders
6
Forward gears
18
Full Puma 240 specs
Challenger MT595E Tractor
ChallengerModel B

Challenger MT595E

Utility

power
236 hp
displacement
449 ci
Cylinders
6
Forward gears
Not recorded
Full MT595E specs
CaseIHCaseIH Puma 240
vs
ChallengerChallenger MT595E

How they compare

Headline specs vs. the whole Row Crop

n = 1,206–1,417

Engine Power

▲ Puma 240 higher · +4 hp (+2%)
Puma 240240 hp
MT595E236 hp
Median Row Crop Tractor138 hp

Puma 240 is in the 86th percentile; MT595E is in the 85th · 1,206 models

Engine Displacement

▲ MT595E higher · +38 ci (+9%)
Puma 240411 ci
MT595E449 ci
Median Row Crop Tractor391 ci

Puma 240 is in the 60th percentile; MT595E is in the 77th · 1,409 models

Cylinders

= Effectively tied
Puma 2406
MT595E6
Median Row Crop Tractor6

Puma 240 is in the 50th percentile; MT595E is in the 50th · 1,417 models

Operating Weight

▲ MT595E higher · +1,665 lb (+10%)
Puma 24016,800 lb
MT595E18,465 lb
Median Row Crop Tractor12,307 lb

Puma 240 is in the 73rd percentile; MT595E is in the 79th · 1,350 models

Puma 240 (A)MT595E (B)Median Row Crop Tractor

Full comparison

Every spec, side by side

General Information

SpecCaseIH Puma 240Challenger MT595EDifference
ManufacturerCaseIHChallenger—
ModelPuma 240MT595E—
CategoryRow CropUtility—

Engine

SpecCaseIH Puma 240Challenger MT595EDifference
ManufacturerFPTAGCO Power—
Power Output240hp236hp▲ Puma 240+4 hp · +2%
Rated RPM2,200RPM2,100RPM▲ Puma 240+100 RPM · +5%
Cylinders66Same
Displacement411ci449ci▲ MT595E+38 ci · +9%
Bore4.1in4.3in▲ MT595E+0.2 in · +5%
Stroke5.2in5.3in▲ MT595E+0.1 in · +2%

Transmission

SpecCaseIH Puma 240Challenger MT595EDifference
TypeFull power shiftContinuously Variable Transmission (CVT) with power management system—

Dimensions & Weight

SpecCaseIH Puma 240Challenger MT595EDifference
WheelbaseNot recorded117in—
Operating Weight16,800lb18,465lb▲ MT595E+1,665 lb · +10%

Hydraulics

SpecCaseIH Puma 240Challenger MT595EDifference
System TypeOpen center pressure flow compensatingClosed-center load sensing—
Pump Flow CapacityNot recorded29.9gpm—
PressureNot recorded2,490psi—
Steering TypePowerPower Steering—

Tires

SpecCaseIH Puma 240Challenger MT595EDifference
Front Tire SizeNot recorded480/70R30—
Rear Tire SizeNot recorded620/70R42—

Tread Width

SpecCaseIH Puma 240Challenger MT595EDifference
Front Tread WidthNot recorded52.8in—
Rear TreadNot recorded52.8in—
Front Tread AdjustmentNot recorded52.8 to 87.8 in—
Rear Tread AdjustmentNot recorded52.8 to 87.8 in—

Hitch & Towing

SpecCaseIH Puma 240Challenger MT595EDifference
Hitch TypeThree-Point HitchThree-Point HitchSame
Hitch Category3III/IIIN—
Hitch PositionRearRearSame
Hitch CapacityNot recorded15,105lb—

Chassis & Drive

SpecCaseIH Puma 240Challenger MT595EDifference
Chassis Type4x4 MFWD 4WD4x4—
Drive Type4WD4WDSame
Steering TypePowerPower Steering—

Electrical

SpecCaseIH Puma 240Challenger MT595EDifference
Starter TypeElectricElectric Starter—

Emissions

SpecCaseIH Puma 240Challenger MT595EDifference
Control SystemSelective catalytic reduction (SCR)Not recorded—

Operator Station

SpecCaseIH Puma 240Challenger MT595EDifference
TypeNot recordedCabin—

Category context

Both models against the field

Engine Power

median 138 hp
A · 86th percentile (240 hp)B · 85th percentile (236 hp)

Engine Displacement

median 391 ci
A · 60th percentile (411 ci)B · 77th percentile (449 ci)

Cylinders

median 6
A · 50th percentile (6)B · 50th percentile (6)

Operating Weight

median 12,307 lb
A · 73rd percentile (16,800 lb)B · 79th percentile (18,465 lb)
A · Puma 240B · MT595EMedian Row Crop Tractor
Full spec pageCaseIH Puma 240Full spec pageChallenger MT595E