Image not recorded
CaseIHModel A
CaseIH Puma 240
Row Crop
- power
- 240 hp
- displacement
- 411 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 18
Head to head · Row Crop
CaseIH Puma 240 vs New Holland T7.250
Image not recorded
New HollandModel B
New Holland T7.250
Row Crop
- power
- 250 hp
- displacement
- 411 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 19
CaseIHCaseIH Puma 240
vs
New HollandNew Holland T7.250
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Row Crop
Engine Power
▲ T7.250 higher · +10 hp (+4%)Puma 240240 hp
T7.250250 hp
Median Row Crop Tractor138 hp
Puma 240 is in the 86th percentile; T7.250 is in the 87th · 1,206 models
Engine Displacement
= Effectively tiedPuma 240411 ci
T7.250411 ci
Median Row Crop Tractor391 ci
Puma 240 is in the 60th percentile; T7.250 is in the 63rd · 1,409 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedPuma 2406
T7.2506
Median Row Crop Tractor6
Puma 240 is in the 50th percentile; T7.250 is in the 50th · 1,417 models
Forward Gears
▲ T7.250 higher · +1 (+6%)Puma 24018
T7.25019
Median Row Crop Tractor16
Puma 240 is in the 61st percentile; T7.250 is in the 68th · 1,200 models
Puma 240 (A)T7.250 (B)Median Row Crop Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 240 | New Holland T7.250 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | CaseIH | New Holland | — |
| Model | Puma 240 | T7.250 | — |
| Category | Row Crop | Row Crop | Same |
Engine
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 240 | New Holland T7.250 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | FPT | FPT | Same |
| Power Output | 240hp | 250hp | ▲ T7.250+10 hp · +4% |
| Rated RPM | 2,200RPM | 2,200RPM | Same |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 | Same |
| Displacement | 411ci | 411ci | Same |
| Bore | 4.1in | 4.1in | Same |
| Stroke | 5.2in | 5.2in | Same |
Transmission
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 240 | New Holland T7.250 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Full power shift | Full power shift / CVT | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 240 | New Holland T7.250 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | Not recorded | 227in | — |
| Width | Not recorded | 97.2in | — |
| Height | Not recorded | 123in | — |
| Operating Weight | 16,800lb | 15,322lb | ▲ Puma 240+1,478 lb · +10% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 240 | New Holland T7.250 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open center pressure flow compensating | Closed center load sensing | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Hydrostatic power | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 240 | New Holland T7.250 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Three-Point Hitch | Three-Point Hitch | Same |
| Hitch Category | 3 | III/II | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Rear | Same |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 240 | New Holland T7.250 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | Same |
| Drive Type | 4WD | MFWD | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Hydrostatic power | — |
Electrical
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 240 | New Holland T7.250 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Emissions
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 240 | New Holland T7.250 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Control System | Selective catalytic reduction (SCR) | Not recorded | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 240 | New Holland T7.250 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | Cab | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 138 hpA · 86th percentile (240 hp)B · 87th percentile (250 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 391 ciA · 60th percentile (411 ci)B · 63rd percentile (411 ci)
Cylinders
median 6A · 50th percentile (6)B · 50th percentile (6)
Forward Gears
median 16A · 61st percentile (18)B · 68th percentile (19)
Operating Weight
median 12,307 lbA · 73rd percentile (16,800 lb)B · 68th percentile (15,322 lb)
A · Puma 240B · T7.250Median Row Crop Tractor