CaseIHModel A
CaseIH Quadtrac Steiger 530QT
Articulated
- power
- 535 hp
- displacement
- 912 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 16
Head to head · Articulated
CaseIH Quadtrac Steiger 530QT vs Challenger MT965E
Image not recorded
ChallengerModel B
Challenger MT965E
Agricultural
- power
- 550 hp
- displacement
- 1,025 ci
- Cylinders
- 12
- Forward gears
- 16
CaseIHCaseIH Quadtrac Steiger 530QT
vs
ChallengerChallenger MT965E
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Articulated
Engine Power
▲ MT965E higher · +15 hp (+3%)Quadtrac Steiger 530QT535 hp
MT965E550 hp
Median Articulated Tractor450 hp
Quadtrac Steiger 530QT is in the 81st percentile; MT965E is in the 86th · 62 models
Engine Displacement
▲ MT965E higher · +113 ci (+12%)Quadtrac Steiger 530QT912 ci
MT965E1,025 ci
Median Articulated Tractor827 ci
Quadtrac Steiger 530QT is in the 67th percentile; MT965E is in the 91st · 61 models
Cylinders
▲ MT965E higher · +6 (+100%)Quadtrac Steiger 530QT6
MT965E12
Median Articulated Tractor6
Quadtrac Steiger 530QT is in the 50th percentile; MT965E is in the 97th · 61 models
Forward Gears
= Effectively tiedQuadtrac Steiger 530QT16
MT965E16
Median Articulated Tractor16
Quadtrac Steiger 530QT is in the 50th percentile; MT965E is in the 50th · 59 models
Quadtrac Steiger 530QT (A)MT965E (B)Median Articulated Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | CaseIH Quadtrac Steiger 530QT | Challenger MT965E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | CaseIH | Challenger | — |
| Model | Quadtrac Steiger 530QT | MT965E | — |
| Category | Articulated | Agricultural | — |
Engine
| Spec | CaseIH Quadtrac Steiger 530QT | Challenger MT965E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Cummins | AGCO Power | — |
| Model | QSX15 | Turbocharged Diesel | — |
| Power Output | 535hp | 550hp | ▲ MT965E+15 hp · +3% |
| Rated RPM | 2,100RPM | 1,900RPM | ▲ Quadtrac Steiger 530QT+200 RPM · +11% |
| Cylinders | 6 | 12 | ▲ MT965E+6 · +100% |
| Displacement | 912ci | 1,025ci | ▲ MT965E+113 ci · +12% |
| Bore | 5.4in | Not recorded | — |
| Stroke | 6.7in | Not recorded | — |
Transmission
| Spec | CaseIH Quadtrac Steiger 530QT | Challenger MT965E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Full powershift | Power Shift | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | CaseIH Quadtrac Steiger 530QT | Challenger MT965E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Operating Weight | 52,410lb | 47,500lb | ▲ Quadtrac Steiger 530QT+4,910 lb · +10% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | CaseIH Quadtrac Steiger 530QT | Challenger MT965E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Not recorded | Closed center pressure-flow compensated | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | CaseIH Quadtrac Steiger 530QT | Challenger MT965E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Position | Not recorded | Rear | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | CaseIH Quadtrac Steiger 530QT | Challenger MT965E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | CaseIH Quadtrac Steiger 530QT | Challenger MT965E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric (24 volts) | Electric | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 450 hpA · 81st percentile (535 hp)B · 86th percentile (550 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 827 ciA · 67th percentile (912 ci)B · 91st percentile (1,025 ci)
Cylinders
median 6A · 50th percentile (6)B · 97th percentile (12)
Forward Gears
median 16A · 50th percentile (16)B · 50th percentile (16)
Operating Weight
median 51,335 lbA · 52nd percentile (52,410 lb)B · 38th percentile (47,500 lb)
A · Quadtrac Steiger 530QTB · MT965EMedian Articulated Tractor